↓ Skip to main content

Reducing abrupt climate change risk using the Montreal Protocol and other regulatory actions to complement cuts in CO2 emissions

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing abrupt climate change risk using the Montreal Protocol and other regulatory actions to complement cuts in CO2 emissions
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2009
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0902568106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Molina, Durwood Zaelke, K. Madhava Sarma, Stephen O. Andersen, Veerabhadran Ramanathan, Donald Kaniaru

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 3%
United States 7 2%
Mexico 4 1%
India 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Réunion 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 310 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 89 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Other 28 8%
Student > Master 27 8%
Other 75 22%
Unknown 38 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 91 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 51 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 12%
Engineering 21 6%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Other 68 20%
Unknown 52 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#399,735
of 26,705,860 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6,994
of 105,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,235
of 183,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#23
of 870 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,705,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 870 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.