The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Strategies of Increased Protein Intake in ELBW Infants Fed by Human Milk Lead to Long Term Benefits
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00272 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elisa Mariani, Augusto Biasini, Lucia Marvulli, Silvia Martini, Arianna Aceti, Giacomo Faldella, Luigi Corvaglia, Alessandra Sansavini, Silvia Savini, Francesca Agostini, Marcello Stella, Erica Neri |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 24% |
Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
Psychology | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 19 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,626,767
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,208
of 10,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,910
of 341,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#59
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.