The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Thrips as a supplementary pollinator in an orchid with granular pollinia: is this mutualism?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ecy.2535 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenji Suetsugu, Shintaro Tetsu, Masayoshi K. Hiraiwa, Tadaaki Tsutsumi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 70 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 93% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
#763,499
of 26,556,112 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#294
of 7,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,307
of 359,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#9
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.