The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Daily music exposure dose and hearing problems using personal listening devices in adolescents and young adults: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Audiology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3109/14992027.2015.1122237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wen Jiang, Fei Zhao, Nicola Guderley, Vinaya Manchaiah |
| Abstract |
This systematic review aimed to explore the evidence on whether the preferred listening levels (PLLs) and durations of music listening through personal listening devices (PLDs) in adolescents and young adults exceed the current recommended 100% daily noise dose; together with the impact on hearing and possible influential factors of such listening behaviours. A systematic search was conducted using multiple online bibliographic databases. The 26 studies were included on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results showed that up to 58.2% of participants exceeded the 100% daily noise dose, particularly in the presence of background noise. Significantly positive correlations were found among background noise levels and mean PLLs, as well as the proportion of participants exceeding the 100% daily noise dose. Moreover, significantly worse hearing thresholds were found in PLD users using audiometry, and significantly poor results in otoacoustic emission (OAE), even in the participants with self-reported 'normal hearing'. It is crucial to develop appropriate standards and safe recommendations for daily music exposure dose in future studies. Providing an essential guide and effective education to adolescents and young adults will help raise awareness, increase knowledge, and consequently change attitudes and listening habits. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 256 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 17% |
| Unknown | 90 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 16% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 17% |
| Unknown | 104 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2024.
All research outputs
#438,671
of 26,127,783 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Audiology
#11
of 1,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,449
of 405,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Audiology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,127,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.