↓ Skip to main content

Objectivity in Science

Overview of attention for book
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 126)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Objectivity in Science
Published by
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1
ISBNs
978-3-31-914348-4, 978-3-31-914349-1
Editors

Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson, Jonathan Y Tsou

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 50%
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,176,577
of 26,382,058 outputs
Outputs from Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
#11
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,125
of 363,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,382,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.