↓ Skip to main content

Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: General and Perceived Fatigue Does Not Depend on Corticospinal Tract Dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: General and Perceived Fatigue Does Not Depend on Corticospinal Tract Dysfunction
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2019.00339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Mordillo-Mateos, Vanesa Soto-Leon, Marta Torres-Pareja, Diego Peinado-Palomino, Nuria Mendoza-Laiz, Carlos Alonso-Bonilla, Michele Dileone, Mario Rotondi, Juan Aguilar, Antonio Oliviero

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 25 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Energy 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 33 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,963,060
of 26,588,565 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#800
of 15,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,793
of 370,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#31
of 376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.