↓ Skip to main content

Globally Consistent Quantitative Observations of Planktonic Ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
52 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Globally Consistent Quantitative Observations of Planktonic Ecosystems
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00196
Authors

Fabien Lombard, Emmanuel Boss, Anya M. Waite, Meike Vogt, Julia Uitz, Lars Stemmann, Heidi M. Sosik, Jan Schulz, Jean-Baptiste Romagnan, Marc Picheral, Jay Pearlman, Mark D. Ohman, Barbara Niehoff, Klas O. Möller, Patricia Miloslavich, Ana Lara-Lpez, Raphael Kudela, Rubens M. Lopes, Rainer Kiko, Lee Karp-Boss, Jules S. Jaffe, Morten H. Iversen, Jean-Olivier Irisson, Katja Fennel, Helena Hauss, Lionel Guidi, Gaby Gorsky, Sarah L. C. Giering, Peter Gaube, Scott Gallager, George Dubelaar, Robert K. Cowen, François Carlotti, Christian Briseño-Avena, Léo Berline, Kelly Benoit-Bird, Nicholas Bax, Sonia Batten, Sakina Dorothée Ayata, Luis Felipe Artigas, Ward Appeltans

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 378 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 89 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 16%
Student > Master 36 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Professor 20 5%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 96 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 85 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 71 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 18%
Engineering 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 24 6%
Unknown 115 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,087,589
of 26,492,291 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#712
of 11,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,595
of 367,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#32
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,492,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.