↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of Exercise Countermeasures for Human Space Flight: Operational Considerations for Concurrent Strength and Aerobic Training

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimization of Exercise Countermeasures for Human Space Flight: Operational Considerations for Concurrent Strength and Aerobic Training
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00584
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas W. Jones, Nora Petersen, Glyn Howatson

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 51 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 32 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 48 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,752,623
of 26,482,830 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,716
of 15,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,490
of 369,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#122
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,482,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.