↓ Skip to main content

REDD+ in Theory and Practice: How Lessons From Local Projects Can Inform Jurisdictional Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
40 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
REDD+ in Theory and Practice: How Lessons From Local Projects Can Inform Jurisdictional Approaches
Published in
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00011
Authors

Sven Wunder, Amy E. Duchelle, Claudio de Sassi, Erin O. Sills, Gabriela Simonet, William D. Sunderlin

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 55 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 40 26%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 63 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,057,187
of 26,583,927 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#63
of 1,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,005
of 389,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,583,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.