↓ Skip to main content

Five Decades Later, Are Mesenchymal Stem Cells Still Relevant?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Five Decades Later, Are Mesenchymal Stem Cells Still Relevant?
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Gomez-Salazar, Zaniah N. Gonzalez-Galofre, Joan Casamitjana, Mihaela Crisan, Aaron W. James, Bruno Péault

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 71 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 7%
Engineering 13 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 82 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,340
of 8,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,028
of 385,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#162
of 313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.