The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Countermovement Jump Training Is More Effective Than Drop Jump Training in Enhancing Jump Height in Non-professional Female Volleyball Players
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00231 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jan Ruffieux, Michael Wälchli, Kyung-Min Kim, Wolfgang Taube |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 56 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 46 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 59 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,074,515
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,802
of 13,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,664
of 394,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#132
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.