↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional, Energy and Sanitary Aspects of Swine Manure and Carcass Co-digestion

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional, Energy and Sanitary Aspects of Swine Manure and Carcass Co-digestion
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, April 2020
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deisi Cristina Tápparo, Paula Rogovski, Rafael Dorighello Cadamuro, Doris Sobral Marques Souza, Charline Bonatto, Aline Frumi Camargo, Thamarys Scapini, Fábio Stefanski, André Amaral, Airton Kunz, Marta Hernández, Helen Treichel, David Rodríguez-Lázaro, Gislaine Fongaro

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 28 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 34 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,990,241
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,090
of 6,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,357
of 377,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#123
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.