The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and Evaluation of Maze-Like Puzzle Games to Assess Cognitive and Motor Function in Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00087 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tobias Nef, Alvin Chesham, Narayan Schütz, Angela Amira Botros, Tim Vanbellingen, Jean-Marc Burgunder, Julia Müllner, René Martin Müri, Prabitha Urwyler |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 57 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 9 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 6% |
Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 12% |
Unknown | 61 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,361,257
of 26,726,803 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,329
of 5,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,716
of 408,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#37
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,726,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.