The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sex Differences in the Response to Different Tinnitus Treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00422 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annemarie Van der Wal, Tine Luyten, Emilie Cardon, Laure Jacquemin, Olivier M. Vanderveken, Vedat Topsakal, Paul Van de Heyning, Willem De Hertogh, Nancy Van Looveren, Vincent Van Rompaey, Sarah Michiels, Annick Gilles |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 3 | 21% |
United States | 2 | 14% |
Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
Germany | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
Scientists | 5 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 30 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,953,294
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,041
of 11,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,584
of 424,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#62
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.