@marook @EBjerkrheim @CEPOS Tropiske cykloner er blevet mere kraftige og den tendens ventes at fortsætte med øget opvarmning: https://t.co/aSiChMKQay
@ctsbillc @KobusingeRose1 Yet here's a more up to date study that demonstrates the increases in major storms over that period and since, and posits it's connection with global warming 🤔 https://t.co/Tr1DNcjMwj
@TheRealRolfster @BrianOrtton @latimeralder Published evidence of an increase in the intensity of tropical cyclones https://t.co/beGTtDh80h
@joesanders33 @jamesjjohnson @bleasdale_r @BatcaveSlimer @ProfMarkMaslin @curryja Note your errors 1) The graph says extreme weather, and you confused storms with tropical hurricanes: https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn 2) https://t.co/duAzJGOcKw
@JunkScience @AP @borenbears "Kossin et al. (2020) document an increase in the global fraction of tropical cyclone intensity estimates reaching at least Category 3 intensity over the past four decades." https://t.co/VVC55scEsK
@RyanMaue @OdysseusBlue @Independent Here’s the research cited by the article. Have you submitted a comment to the journal? https://t.co/IjvuLnnhM1
@GregJacob15 @CupoJoeBlow @YouTube Climate change doesn't increase the frequency of hurricanes. It amps up their intensity. And rising sea levels increases the damage to coastal areas. https://t.co/Mqp67tHd2R
@ClimateDepot See Kossin et al. https://t.co/noqVSgwPJ4 as Mocha reached Cat 5 intensity prior to landfall; it weakened before landfall.
RT @future_timeline: @NelsonDaleSmith @dantrimont And indeed, here's a published, peer-reviewed journal study (as opposed to obscure link f…
@NelsonDaleSmith @dantrimont And indeed, here's a published, peer-reviewed journal study (as opposed to obscure link from fossil fuel industry shill). "...significant global trends in tropical cyclone intensity over the past four decades." https://t.co/O
@MatthewWielicki Matthew again cherry picks and misleads his followers. Wind speed (ACE) is also only one measure of the intensity and destructiveness of cyclones. Actual experts, conducting actual scientific research, agree that they are becoming more in
@boulderfish @MatthewWielicki It’s already happening: https://t.co/vInhZrculk https://t.co/Feneugzzin
@FermiLevels @curryja https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn Global increase in major tropical cyclone exceedance probability over the past four decades
@MatthewWielicki @IPCC_CH @NOAA There have been multiple studies on increasing TC intensity (including this one studying 4000 tropical cyclones). While it varies by basin, the observations match the expected increases. https://t.co/Mqp67tHd2R https://t.co/
RT @TheDisproof: @TiceRichard @NOAA Try again: Global increase in major tropical cyclone exceedance probability over the past four decades…
RT @TheDisproof: @TiceRichard @NOAA Try again: Global increase in major tropical cyclone exceedance probability over the past four decades…
RT @TheDisproof: @TiceRichard @NOAA Try again: Global increase in major tropical cyclone exceedance probability over the past four decades…
@cswbertie @Ed_Miliband Try again https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
@TiceRichard @NOAA Try again: Global increase in major tropical cyclone exceedance probability over the past four decades https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
@_ClimateCraze https://t.co/noqVSgwPJ4 Maybe you should read some papers.
@ianward2000 I have the same amount of qualifications in climate science that Matthew does. The difference is, I provide links to scientific studies by actual climate scientists, Matthew only provides memes and out of context graphs. You should try it s
@NotAHoax @Jeppespip @_ClimateCraze He doesn’t understand the difference between theory and reality. He also only focused on North Atlantic hurricane and not overall TC. Theory based on past events and trends of global warming shows intensity of hurricane
@YohNeighbor @NotAHoax @JunkScience Ok mr misinformation https://t.co/aaqoihCJ7C https://t.co/OWzpmkJsD0 https://t.co/prLJwXvb6l https://t.co/6SOcrzgfy7 In order for understanding why they will increase in intensity you must know what causes this tha
@MatthewWielicki @KIVUNature @bjkaribian Your middle graph apparently shows a high proportion of major hurricanes? Picked up in these studies https://t.co/ZAKOZy3DiB and https://t.co/Nygkqb1uoJ
@DavidJIppolito1 @covid_quest @MatthewWielicki You missed it: https://t.co/OoSDuUHE4H
@ElkhartLakeC8 @MatthewWielicki Except for this. Notice how I link to scientific studies and Matthew just posts out of context graphs and links to blogs. https://t.co/OoSDuUHE4H
@covid_quest @MatthewWielicki In case you missed it https://t.co/OoSDuUHE4H
@NewProtectorate @MatthewWielicki No. Matthew brings simplified graphs and strawman arguments. I bring scientific studies. Try to keep up. https://t.co/OoSDuUHE4H
@goshawk_guy @MatthewWielicki I know actual science is a lot harder to read than Matthew’s simplistic graphs, but here you go https://t.co/OoSDuUHE4H
@DanEtti @LucioMM1 Ok, ultimo tentativo, ti rimetto uno dei due paper, con evidenze più recenti, poi posso classificarvi come analfabeti funzionali. https://t.co/hOPsvblqNv
@LucioMM1 @DanEtti Martelli, leggiti la letteratura scientifica. Io ti ho già detto che non ho intenzione di risponderti se usi questo modo di fare. https://t.co/hOPsvblqNv https://t.co/NoEglbSNlQ
@_ClimateCraze Two years? This is four decades. https://t.co/noqVSgwPJ4
RT @TheDisproof: @MatthewWielicki @IPCC_CH Matthew leaves out the rest of the section. Why was that? Note https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
@MatthewWielicki @IPCC_CH Matthew leaves out the rest of the section. Why was that? Note https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
@WeiZhangAtmos @TedNordhaus @Marcusdstewart @RogerPielkeJr Note observations https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
@latimeralder @nick9000 @bjames280961 @antmcguire @SteveGott6 Still ignoring this? https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
@latimeralder @nick9000 @bjames280961 @antmcguire @SteveGott6 Note your error https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
@latimeralder @nick9000 @bjames280961 @antmcguire @SteveGott6 That is from a blog. You meant cyclones? Note https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
RT @TheDisproof: @ItsTheAtmospher @latimeralder I found this of interest https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
@ItsTheAtmospher @latimeralder I found this of interest https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
RT @TheDisproof: @MatthewWielicki @Greenpeace Matthew note 4 decades: https://t.co/0HWOffahDd Freddy was probably the longest duration on r…
RT @TheDisproof: @MatthewWielicki @Greenpeace Matthew note 4 decades: https://t.co/0HWOffahDd Freddy was probably the longest duration on r…
RT @TheDisproof: @MatthewWielicki @Greenpeace Matthew note 4 decades: https://t.co/0HWOffahDd Freddy was probably the longest duration on r…
RT @TheDisproof: @MatthewWielicki @Greenpeace Matthew note 4 decades: https://t.co/0HWOffahDd Freddy was probably the longest duration on r…
RT @TheDisproof: @MatthewWielicki @Greenpeace Matthew note 4 decades: https://t.co/0HWOffahDd Freddy was probably the longest duration on r…
@_Escapekey_ @MatthewWielicki @Greenpeace https://t.co/2X3flo6Zbu https://t.co/EgR9gCwJ98 No, deniers use cold weather events to attempt to con the public. Extreme weather in general is a symptom of global heating
RT @TheDisproof: @MatthewWielicki @Greenpeace Matthew note 4 decades: https://t.co/0HWOffahDd Freddy was probably the longest duration on r…
@MatthewWielicki @Greenpeace Matthew note 4 decades: https://t.co/0HWOffahDd Freddy was probably the longest duration on record. It also likely had the highest ACE on record. It reintensified multiple times.
@mikesamerica @ScienceNotDogma You cited a blog. Meanwhile over the last 5 weeks we saw the most powerful Cyclone on record which lasted for 5 weeks and has killed hundreds. Also see https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
RT @TheDisproof: @MatthewWielicki Note 4 decades https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
@MatthewWielicki Note 4 decades https://t.co/oliZfm3KNn
@BlindPartisans @danmiller999 @MatthewWielicki "...identify significant global trends in TC intensity over the past four decades. The results should serve to increase confidence in projections of increased TC intensity under continued warming." https://t.c
@SPM219 Over the past four decades, chances of a given TC being cat 3-5 has risen 5%/decade globally and 15%/decade in the South Pacific. (https://t.co/lBag1g6KYl) We know TCs are coming closer to land each decade (source above) and GHGs are likely partly
@fupabox @emilio97493490 "show me the storms .... are worse" https://t.co/UJlHaOWJ8w
@Snooonions @ShellenbergerMD because this chart isn't showing the whole picture, and because the mainstream news media isn't actually the left. https://t.co/AqgIRmUqvE
@WeatherCast3 @ChrisMartzWX https://t.co/noqVSgwPJ4 "Here the homogenized global TC intensity record is extended to the 39-y period 1979–2017, and statistically significant (at the 95% confidence level) increases are identified."
RT @ChrisMartzWX: Science is established through observation and careful measurement that validates a hypothesis. Science is not establishe…
RT @ChrisMartzWX: Scientists can and will manipulate statistics to get a certain result. The only reason the proportion of major hurricane…
RT @ChrisMartzWX: Science is established through observation and careful measurement that validates a hypothesis. Science is not establishe…
Science is established through observation and careful measurement that validates a hypothesis. Science is not established by one's beliefs, feelings, theory or model. In the study you linked, you missed the part where they said observations don't validate
RT @ChrisMartzWX: Scientists can and will manipulate statistics to get a certain result. The only reason the proportion of major hurricane…
RT @tim_dunkerton: Dvorak isn’t a measurement, Oak.
Dvorak isn’t a measurement, Oak.
RT @ChrisMartzWX: Scientists can and will manipulate statistics to get a certain result. The only reason the proportion of major hurricane…
Scientists can and will manipulate statistics to get a certain result. The only reason the proportion of major hurricanes have increased globally is because total hurricane counts have decreased. It skews the ratio. There has been no actual trend in majo
@ChrisMartzWX Does that square with this paper? https://t.co/noqVSgwPJ4
@l_davidovich @EDavidAn @MRobertsQLD That's data for cyclones that make landfall in Australia. Tropical cyclones affect the entire South Pacific region https://t.co/yr0jvdUjzb
@JunkScience Let's look at real science for a change. https://t.co/noqVSgxnyC
@The_Sossage @TonyClimate It does. The US East coast is one small area. Tropical storms affect entire regions https://t.co/IjvuLnnhM1 https://t.co/neMjzwCmzc
@The_Sossage @TonyClimate Let what go? There's not a researcher in the field that says cyclones haven't been accurately measured since the 1960's. https://t.co/IjvuLnnhM1
@jordanbpeterson You've truly left the scientific realm. The prediction was and is stronger and longer, exactly as observed: https://t.co/Bb3MeT69p1
@RudyForst @chrisacorbett @realAaronHermes @elonmusk @jordanbpeterson Seems to be backed by the EPA: https://t.co/F9pbmQpbSy… And by peer-reviewed papers: https://t.co/nzJcdDotwU This isn't controversial, contested or pseudoscience.
@buvery @MuzzaMac1 @MikeHudema Actually, when you look at the data in each major ocean, what we see across the board is an increase in likelihood of major tropical storms. Including in the Pacific https://t.co/OUHR07Cq3b https://t.co/ZTmWA9xo1v
@whataboutyas @zackblitz2 @eokugbo @Gyaneshwarrr If you don't trust that write-up, here is the study. https://t.co/ZNQcL9x4hE
@Robin_Hagues @DanSull36510584 @TonyClimate @SenWarren You must have missed the link to this study https://t.co/IjvuLnnhM1
@jsbrads @sophielouisecc You've missed my point. Hurricanes have been getting stronger. If you want to deny climate change, it's your prerogative to have such beliefs. But the evidence is published and peer-reviewed, and still carries more weight to me tha