↓ Skip to main content

Determination of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
485 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determination of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2020
DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.11586
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Greer, Sam D. Shemie, Ariane Lewis, Sylvia Torrance, Panayiotis Varelas, Fernando D. Goldenberg, James L. Bernat, Michael Souter, Mehmet Akif Topcuoglu, Anne W. Alexandrov, Marie Baldisseri, Thomas Bleck, Giuseppe Citerio, Rosanne Dawson, Arnold Hoppe, Stephen Jacobe, Alex Manara, Thomas A. Nakagawa, Thaddeus Mason Pope, William Silvester, David Thomson, Hussain Al Rahma, Rafael Badenes, Andrew J. Baker, Vladimir Cerny, Cherylee Chang, Tiffany R. Chang, Elena Gnedovskaya, Moon-Ku Han, Stephen Honeybul, Edgar Jimenez, Yasuhiro Kuroda, Gang Liu, Uzzwal Kumar Mallick, Victoria Marquevich, Jorge Mejia-Mantilla, Michael Piradov, Sarah Quayyum, Gentle Sunder Shrestha, Ying-ying Su, Shelly D. Timmons, Jeanne Teitelbaum, Walter Videtta, Kapil Zirpe, Gene Sung

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 589 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 485 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 70 14%
Researcher 54 11%
Student > Postgraduate 41 8%
Student > Bachelor 32 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 6%
Other 113 23%
Unknown 144 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 208 43%
Neuroscience 21 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 4%
Unspecified 11 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Other 48 10%
Unknown 167 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 562. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#45,855
of 26,571,932 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#921
of 37,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,607
of 432,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#47
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,932 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.