The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How logrolling can explain the failure of the government coalition in Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista de Administração Pública, December 2006
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0034-76122006000500006 |
Authors |
Márcio André de Carvalho |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 22% |
Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 22% |
Researcher | 2 | 22% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 44% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 22% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Administração Pública
#27
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,941
of 167,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Administração Pública
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them