The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Local vs. Global Blood Flow Modulation in Artificial Microvascular Networks: Effects on Red Blood Cell Distribution and Partitioning
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.566273 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alberto Mantegazza, Matteo Ungari, Francesco Clavica, Dominik Obrist |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 18% |
Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 13 | 46% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#13,119,194
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,119
of 13,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,352
of 409,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#145
of 419 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 419 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.