The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Animal Models for COVID-19: More to the Picture Than ACE2, Rodents, Ferrets, and Non-human Primates. A Case for Porcine Respiratory Coronavirus and the Obese Ossabaw Pig
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2020.573756 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter M. H. Heegaard, Michael Sturek, Mouhamad Alloosh, Graham J. Belsham |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 2 | 17% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
India | 1 | 8% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,827,349
of 26,078,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,533
of 30,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,224
of 434,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#145
of 880 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,078,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 880 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.