↓ Skip to main content

Grand Challenges in Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Sensors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Sensors, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Grand Challenges in Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Sensors
Published in
Frontiers in Sensors, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fsens.2020.583822
Authors

Celia Ferrag, Kagan Kerman

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 31 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 14%
Engineering 9 12%
Materials Science 4 5%
Chemical Engineering 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 33 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#20,923,203
of 26,583,927 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sensors
#30
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,854
of 438,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sensors
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,583,927 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.