The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Controlled evaluation of thermal biofeedback in treatment of elevated blood pressure in unmedicated mild hypertension
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, June 1996
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02284694 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Edward B. Blanchard, George Eisele, Alisa Vollmer, Annette Payne, Michael Gordon, Peter Cornish, Linda Gilmore |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Russia | 1 | 2% |
Poland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 14% |
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 29% |
Psychology | 10 | 24% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,846,680
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#70
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,170
of 26,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them