@dhagedornjr @nemuritoare @KelleyAshbyPaul @RandPaul It's a nice argument, but science.@dhagedornjr https://t.co/SmZOlhvrpd
@SheriTwigg @HylianApologist @AndrewMakeTweet @EmilyAnthes I can find a few. https://t.co/Tjz2F9TzeC https://t.co/WvN1YpF9Er https://t.co/jHd4lyfjc2 https://t.co/gLK9VyonNJ Need any more?
@samanthamaiden @nick_coatsworth @newscomauHQ What about masks in non-healthcare settings? No. https://t.co/jAr58WeqkK
@emile_hay @ianmSC @Jonathan_Witt Food for thought: https://t.co/2eZAhJyBlw
@sdcrosby Re last claim, maybe or maybe not:
@garydumbrill Yeah or you could try this:
@iamchinaglia Uh, wrong on the first point:
@tzimtzoomer @nytimes So even the article you apparently think offers overwhelming evidence of the efficacy of masks, by its own admission, does nothing of the sort. Meanwhile if you cast your net a bit wider:/3
@JamesTLeahy @hpmacd Well, there’s no strong evidence that it actually works so it seems to me basically a cargo cult-ish way to “do something” along the lines of why we have to take shoes off at airports
@Augusto_SQ @ggreenwald @ThatWhichIsNot These assertions rely on the unfounded belief that masks work:
@CeleryHate For example:
@rogtron Example of the studies in case you’re interested:
@slowphotograph2 It’s the maskers who have lied about and tried to suppress the fact that there is no evidence that masks protect anyone from Covid in the community. You are a conduit of propaganda, nothing more.
@Mauro_Murgia @SadiqKhan @TfL Hmm, No randomised controlled trials. Some evidence for N95s in some settings. It's interesting to look at some pre-covid science on masks for perspective. What do you think? https://t.co/1Ny66SKAuA https://t.co/tPXMyvgPiL htt
@mfoz1707 @JohnWest_JAWS @BBCRadio4 @bbcnickrobinson @Ofcom Another meta-analisys finds no statistically significant effect of masks on the wearer (the 95% CRI for efficacy is between -15% to 20% ) https://t.co/nlS0keXlzV 3/
@aric_isaacs @RealAdamWard @tag20370 @wontytump @darrenmark69 @TheFreds @GillianMcKeith @T4Recovery @fantasticmusic @cliff_grieve @pcrclaims @SteveBakerHW 56. "Effectiveness of Surgical Face Masks in Reducing Acute Respiratory Infections in Non-Healthcare
@YsbrydShadow @NeilClark66 https://t.co/Xm5wcVrl5X Conclusion ineffective.
@NeilGodwin3 @pappermia @DavidJChristop1 @MaxRobertFinch https://t.co/Xm5wcVrl5X In this study the authors / researchers concluded that masks were ineffective.
@CFCTEL @suzseddon I'll repeat: "Masks if used APPROPRIATELY can reduce transmission (referring to clinical setting really)" Appropriately: worn by health care professionals as per guidelines in appropriate sterilised clinical setting. Loads of studies
@AsylumSeaker @dev_dot_eth @SBF_Alameda https://t.co/EyjhUINYvJ https://t.co/gwJJL4AEnl There wasn't consensus prior to covid-19 and there still isn't now (Fauci flip flop) - this could be down to a lot of factors, but in the real world the impacts seem
@ShaunWebster94 @_Mykee_ @SuzanneEvans1 @jfoster2019 @PoliticsForAlI @DailyMailUK I mean I doubt you will be persuaded but.... https://t.co/ZOnsKnGPTS https://t.co/y9y4a2t7Kd https://t.co/zLpD8erJS5
RT @hamagikukai: メタ分析で一般人のサージカルマスク着用と急性呼吸器感染症の感染低下には、有意な関係が見られないとする論文 → Effectiveness of Surgical Face Masks in Reducing Acute Respirator…
RT @hamagikukai: メタ分析で一般人のサージカルマスク着用と急性呼吸器感染症の感染低下には、有意な関係が見られないとする論文 → Effectiveness of Surgical Face Masks in Reducing Acute Respirator…
メタ分析で一般人のサージカルマスク着用と急性呼吸器感染症の感染低下には、有意な関係が見られないとする論文 → Effectiveness of Surgical Face Masks in Reducing Acute Respiratory Infections in Non-Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis https://t.co/MJSjGaLrUf
RT @RonaldCrossPeru: Por el amor de Dios, @pcm háganle caso a los científicos: los protectores faciales no sirven para el día a día ordinar…
RT @RonaldCrossPeru: Por el amor de Dios, @pcm háganle caso a los científicos: los protectores faciales no sirven para el día a día ordinar…
Por el amor de Dios, @pcm háganle caso a los científicos: los protectores faciales no sirven para el día a día ordinario. Lo que sirve son las mascarillas KN95. Regálenlas por doquier!!!
@SolCn Es una estupidez fuera de sitios con alta carga viral (hospitales covid, UCI), en lo único que puede ayudar es en no tocarte la cara, pero lentes son suficiente. Ya hay estudios clínicos que demuestran que no son eficaces: https://t.co/iDHJhQaBST
@sanderwagner @kltblom @t0nyyates @JoMicheII @toby_n @ajb_powell The literature has been politicised. There are studies that can be picked & mixed to serve any political agenda. Here's my pick: Vitamin D (Lancet) "risk reduction was small" https://t.
@JPNessFant Do you want data on why your apparent faith in masks may be somewhat misguided (and I have the intellectual humility here to say “May be”):
RT @JacketNation89: @LiftRunBang The next time Karen comes at ya: Conclusion: Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare s…
@LiftRunBang @AJA_Cortes 😄 A rather different conclusion from the authors. Anyway Covid is spread through respiration. But bro science. https://t.co/wXxvv8ZO0M https://t.co/X8xrexG06x
@cheeky_mac @jonathancassini @annaberu @CliveRiley2 How about some peer reviewed papers? https://t.co/osZf2xxdkb https://t.co/K91pJP8QpL https://t.co/mfKxVbTnVV Like covid and wearing masks sucks no one wants to do it however it does help.
RT @JoaoOProprio: @khprototype @albertogonc @fc_miguel81 Só em meta-análises, que são o topo da pirâmida da evidência científica: - https:/…
RT @JoaoOProprio: @khprototype @albertogonc @fc_miguel81 Só em meta-análises, que são o topo da pirâmida da evidência científica: - https:/…
@khprototype @albertogonc @fc_miguel81 Só em meta-análises, que são o topo da pirâmida da evidência científica: - https://t.co/lJA1STv30B ; - https://t.co/glI7L5ikRJ ; - https://t.co/qBTCjMRe5n ; - https://t.co/XBTWtuFsfo
@stiffasaward @stevenThompson8 @cjones47 @notdred @JordanSchachtel “Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare settings is not significantly associated with reduction in acute respiratory illness incidence in this meta-review.” https://t.co
@TheBrennenGreen @FreeKentucky202 @docbrandon12 @shespeakslisten Start with this. One of the issues is that you are asking to prove a negative. When the state is going to force a behavior it is the state's responsibility to prove their case. Also, there
@EveLewi65296271 @bk24708 @WDRBNews @RandPaul Which “scientists” and “epidemiologists”? The only ones stupid enough to think you ought to wear a mask (or 2 or 3) are the ones being paid to say so. Meanwhile: https://t.co/v5M63VYVRu
@the_viall_inn @catturd2 @atensnut 4/ "Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare settings is not significantly associated with reduction in [acute respiratory illness] incidence in this meta-review." https://t.co/BWHolsdGYL
@nothing4realk @mamasaurusMeg @KristenMeghan @KidJ6B @Khanoisseur @JamesCasciano4 4/ "Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare settings is not significantly associated with reduction in [acute respiratory illness] incidence in this meta-re
@stiffasaward @rebekahboo78 @cjones47 @notdred “Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare settings is not significantly associated with reduction in acute respiratory illness incidence in this meta-review.” https://t.co/hEVpoQlDJV
@stevenThompson8 @slj @cjones47 @notdred “Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare settings is not significantly associated with reduction in acute respiratory illness incidence in this meta-review.” https://t.co/hEVpoQlDJV
RT @RoyWills7: @KatKenn48 @DavidJHarrisJr 😂🤣😂 LOL!!! Masks DO NOT WORK against a virus. Pure science. No business can force people to wear…
@Tomasz_Obremski @OnetWiadomosci Cała wiedza medyczna, której potrzebujesz jest powszechnie dostępna w internecie - za darmo. Wystarczy trochę własnego wkładu żeby się doedukować zamiast wierzyć ślepo w opłaconych lekarzy z TV... https://t.co/zddWij8Vtj
RT @RoyWills7: @jeffstorobinsky @mtgreenee @FlyFrontier LOL!!!😂🤣😂 Sure, throw the words “common sense” around when you obviously have none.…
@thesusone11 @OzymandiasChim @GarbyJooman3 Yeah that’s not the idea. Hers surgical masks, let alone a cloth one: https://t.co/6nQp2dWh7N . Leave people alone.
@omenrust @GamingGentleWan @douchefuturist @nypost Science is not a religion lol. Unless there is no common agreement, it's not scientific Ms/Mr "ignorance" Here is another one: https://t.co/kZiif0kQR6
@OpDracula @Loretta_Torrago @ojavuo_tuula @_okayshane @jhaskinscabrera @ianmSC "review failed to find a statistically significant effect ... Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare settings is not significantly associated with reduction i
@JayDavidMurphy @POTUS https://t.co/DSHvMi1gHk Conclusion: Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare settings is not significantly associated with reduction in ARI incidence in this meta-review.
@UGAFanTim @thehill Effectiveness of Surgical Face Masks in Reducing Acute Respiratory Infections in Non-Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis https://t.co/7Tf5twVlwe
RT @uguraktemur_: İnsanlık tarihi içinde maskenin virüse karşı koruyuculuğu ile ilgili yapılmış tek çalışma, maskenin asemptomatik ve sağlı…
İnsanlık tarihi içinde maskenin virüse karşı koruyuculuğu ile ilgili yapılmış tek çalışma, maskenin asemptomatik ve sağlık sektörü dışındaki insanlarda herhangi bir koruma sağlamadığını söylüyor. Herşeyi bilen bilim kurulu bu çalışmaya hiç atıf yapmıyor. h
@SamBrockNBC @NBCNews https://t.co/LI2ILsGZQM Conclusion: Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare settings is not significantly associated with reduction in ARI incidence in this meta-review.
@Stoney_Holiday @WSJ Please read this https://t.co/YMgUheodHP
@Clateralusboi Maskenin riski azalttığına dair bir tane bile çalışma yok. dedikodu mahiyetinde bilim sitelerinde çıkan kanaat yazıları. Paylaştım görmemişsin. Maske ile ilgili yapılan tek çalışma birkaç ay önce yayınlandı ve herhangi bir koruma sağlamadığı
RT @RoyWills7: @nadalotta @KevinCyron @nypost Actual science (if you’re interested...which, judging by your profile, you aren’t😂): https:/…
@JReinerMD @RandPaul You’re the embarrassment Dr. Reiner. Masks don’t work https://t.co/uw64v2R5Ed for an asymptomatic general population. They’ve never worked https://t.co/lekCQpkyRx. As public health officials and most doctors know https://t.co/GphHAjY3P
@gjackson2019 @BNicholsLiberty @WhiteHouse Educate yourself: https://t.co/YMgUheodHP
@Amanda00924040 @AnnastaciaMP Such as, ‘Conclusion: Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare settings is not significantly associated with reduction in ARI incidence in this meta-review.’ https://t.co/o6g6jG4tnw
RT @Eyecatcher_Pro: First of two recent studies on mask wearing https://t.co/P9lFpy2L7S Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-he…
RT @Eyecatcher_Pro: First of two recent studies on mask wearing https://t.co/P9lFpy2L7S Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-he…
RT @Eyecatcher_Pro: First of two recent studies on mask wearing https://t.co/P9lFpy2L7S Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-he…
RT @Eyecatcher_Pro: First of two recent studies on mask wearing https://t.co/P9lFpy2L7S Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-he…
RT @Eyecatcher_Pro: First of two recent studies on mask wearing https://t.co/P9lFpy2L7S Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-he…
https://t.co/GMFFaT36wG Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 studies; 3507 people); and probably makes no difference in how many people have flu confirmed by a labor
First of two recent studies on mask wearing https://t.co/P9lFpy2L7S Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare settings is not significantly associated with reduction in ARI [acute respiratory illnesses] incidence in this meta-review.
tl;dr "Surgical mask wearing among individuals in non-healthcare settings is not significantly associated with reduction in ARI incidence in this meta-review." https://t.co/6ZAdGZZQRv
@PushedButton @HollyoaksSilly @RJ20Sharkey @10DowningStreet Here is one (you are welcome) - of course you know about the Danish study but I thought I'd show you another one:https://t.co/pZG0djbVGn
RT @ShpanMan: @Plinz @StewartalsopIII Masks don't prevent the spread of respiratory viruses, this has been studied for many years. https:/…
@Plinz @StewartalsopIII Masks don't prevent the spread of respiratory viruses, this has been studied for many years. https://t.co/bNnUDcAAxz https://t.co/wk5WXmWgN2 https://t.co/RZQI0G0Jlz Same results exist where schools were open as well. People don't w
@lizzyroz @GeorgeMonbiot the virus is airborn and "rides" on aerosols. All 3 kinds of medical masks reduce the spread of aerosols when breathing or speaking. The load of aerosols in the air is reduced and so is the risk of an infection for third persons. C
@JohannaSzabo1 @me_gosh72 @mitchdurie1 @NSWHealth Plenty of other studies, like this one for example: https://t.co/MGuOW7MtoC or few more all state the same thing, I'm inclined not to claim biased/contaminated data set. I have yet to see a single ONE, just
RT @daily_barbarian: A meta-analysis published in September concludes there is no evidence that surgical masks significantly reduce respira…
RT @ClickingSeason: Believe the Science is blatantly anti-scientific. It means "believe this result, but not that result." It means "never…
RT @daily_barbarian: A meta-analysis published in September concludes there is no evidence that surgical masks significantly reduce respira…
RT @jellen805: Take off the ridiculous face diapers.
RT @daily_barbarian: A meta-analysis published in September concludes there is no evidence that surgical masks significantly reduce respira…
RT @jellen805: Take off the ridiculous face diapers. https://t.co/tWlTfOx39M
Take off the ridiculous face diapers.
RT @daily_barbarian: A meta-analysis published in September concludes there is no evidence that surgical masks significantly reduce respira…
RT @daily_barbarian: A meta-analysis published in September concludes there is no evidence that surgical masks significantly reduce respira…