| Title |
Analgesia and Sedation Strategies in Mechanically Ventilated Adults with COVID‐19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmacotherapy, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/phar.2471 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher D. Adams, Jerry Altshuler, Brooke L. Barlow, Deepali Dixit, Christopher A. Droege, Muhammad K. Effendi, Mojdeh S. Heavner, Jackie P. Johnston, Amy L. Kiskaddon, Diana G. Lemieux, Steven M. Lemieux, Audrey J. Littlefield, Kent A Owusu, Ginger E. Rouse, Melissa L. Thompson Bastin, Karen Berger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 43% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Jordan | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 15% |
| Scientists | 8 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#992,359
of 26,215,468 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacotherapy
#94
of 2,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,033
of 531,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacotherapy
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.