Masking did absolutely nothing and the vaccines didn’t prevent infection nor transmission, they simply mitigated the severity of the symptoms in an individual. These are the same folks who lied to us about the entire despicable episode in the first place,
3. VACCINES helped slow the spread of the virus Nature Scientific Reports: https://t.co/I9CYUTqV8V The New England Journal of Medicine: https://t.co/tPZaod8o3C Nature Medicine: https://t.co/esvuOM41GA Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (CDC) https:/
@MajorAirpower @a97f616cb3 @AlwaysSassy1961 Not getting sick with COVID is precisely what the original clinical trials proved. The 94-95% efficacy seen in the trial was trumped around world. So everyone knew right off that bat that 5-6% would still get sic
@Shane_BSer @ing_thegame @Debunk_the_Funk @TheChiefNerd https://t.co/ZmTDdKx2fK Here's the phase 3 trial. You have no idea what you are talking about.
@Megalodon_2nd Both. Would you expect differential reporting of COVID-19 by group? You do realize the trials used PCR testing? Can you will yourself to have a positive PCR test? https://t.co/SynKdfBssT https://t.co/ZejnTOVPK9
@Megalodon_2nd All these trials used a saline placebo. https://t.co/ptOXtc2RHt
@LeonPalaiodimos Ορίστε?? Πως ήταν "ψευδές" για το αρχικό στέλεχος? https://t.co/Lm3c6CEzcN
@1979eric1979 @ThaCleanerNL @8cijfers @StassenFrank @reint_veen Phase 3 results: https://t.co/hgFS3DP5Mo Dus niet overgeslagen en fase 4 is begonnen in januari 2021 dus ook niet overgeslagen.
@DiedSuddenly_ All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good s
@MajorAirpower @a97f616cb3 @AlwaysSassy1961 Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested the vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% efficacy against symptomatic infection, and published the results in the New England Journal of
@Keldran Bon non ..elle a été publiée en l’état Enfin si tu parles de l’étude publiée le 10 décembre 2020 de Pfizer l’étude est là: Celle qui a servi à l’autorisation de mise sur le marché elle est bien ici, relis là: https://t.co/2quUFZLapn https://t.co/
@VigilantFox Hmm, a vigilant Fox on X, or the @NEJM… who should we believe? https://t.co/dKCUwXYqfS
@taddy0131 はいサリドマイドの催奇形性を起こすメカニズム。 レンツ警告も服用者群と非服用者群との比較でしたけど? https://t.co/tYh78ccJsL NEJMのデータは日本のデータじゃないとか論点ズレた事言っておりますがhealthy vaccine effectバイアスがかからない二重盲検検査なんですが? https://t.co/HiAvsY1YZR
@Keldran Alors tu as lu les biais et les fraudes dont parlent les liens que je t’ai envoyé ? Qu’est ce que tu penses que la justice va faire de ça ? Les rajouter au dossier ? Et ça c’est l’étude même de Pfizer publiée le 10 décembre 2020 : Clique et vérif
@taddy0131 お前や。 ぐうの音も出ないから『自明』とか言って具体的な説明から逃げてるんだろ?要らん罵倒もしてるし。 安全性と有効性はこの通り確認済みだし https://t.co/HiAvsY1YZR 現実問題接種した方が死んでない https://t.co/gFcaXwHrI5 https://t.co/9LjF7MuJc3 素人考えの基準が付け入る隙なんか無い
Εν τέλει η πραγματικότητα... https://t.co/hh7TH4gSfn https://t.co/peLYJC2jWj
@SHomburg "Confirmed Covid-19 was defined ... as the presence of at least one of the following symptoms ... combined with a respiratory specimen ... that was positive for SARS-CoV-2 by nucleic acid amplification–based testing" https://t.co/veeUvntIC0
@mivesminebo @uredjenasrbija @RihaAntonela Vakcine su ispitane! To što laici ne razumeju kako ispitivanje funkcioniše i ne razlikuju kad se nešto istražuje u vreme kad nema i kad postoji imperativ je druga vrsta problema. Kad vas medved pojuri, trčite koli
@VanBreedamLouis @GG8918698281012 Nee, dat brengt Pfizer niet. En jij wéét dat, want dat is jou al tientallen keren verteld. En heb jij ECHT nog nooit naar de testdata gekeken? Is deze link jou nooit gestuurd? https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk https://t.co/QAlLU
@JoshuaGaspar @Debunk_the_Funk @rozoveanu All of the clinical trial data is published, you could look it up yourself if you cared to. Here are links to a few: https://t.co/8cWQVAC0Jm https://t.co/A8H2R3P7RU https://t.co/s8LNYQ0dbI https://t.co/pPLMNi3rIu h
@1_TMF_ @dr_jon_l @HopiNg66966500 Oh dear you think the Pfizer mRNA vaccine was not tested against placebo 🤦♂️ https://t.co/vxX7lpuxNb https://t.co/sUK14TXV9u
@JohanneBouquet @MathieuMolimard My bad, mauvaise source vu qu'un com plus haut parlait de l'astrazeneca. Mais pour le comirnaty, plusieurs affirmations sont toujours fausses : https://t.co/5IvWgLYune
@Debunk_the_Funk All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, g
@AgustinaZgz @trufusart @heathenofthecr1 @aflorrick77 Lea bien el primer estudio. No concluye eso. Son más de 43000 voluntarios, no 100. https://t.co/Wvf2Z3gc2q
@Lardino_choi @dean5745 @yay_its_james Have you even read this? lol https://t.co/zR06XSF3RL
@Diego77197524 @licenciaro @PatriciaJMadrid @Dr_Julio_Medina Vos sos idiota en serio. Idiota no, hijo de p u t.a porque no se puede ser tan idiota. Si criticaste un artículo que supuestamente financia Pfizer antes que se dé ninguna vacuna lo que se dice e
@WW3by2020 @LuciferX_Fallen @CyberKo_ala Also the whole premise of experimental went out when they went through trials
@hiro95552236 自分が知的優越感にひたるあまり他人がまったく検証していない、政府が言ったから推奨している、という誤った認識はやめましょう。 あなたこそ「ネットに書いてあるから」というだけで多くのデマを信じているのに、そこになんの違いがあるんでしょうか? https://t.co/5yVZhw5QGN
@insins31544458 @Ken__kaneki33 Les effets indésirables sont évalués depuis les essais de phase 1 et reportés à chaque étapes, comme ici en phase 3 : https://t.co/mlTWQxnS3f
@JulienFort4bis @Maitre_Eolas @PbjbP @lonnibesancon @Nos_Ket C'est totalement mensonger. Voilà le compte rendu des essais, vous n'y trouverez rien de tel : https://t.co/mlTWQxnS3f
@Ken__kaneki33 @ChatSecouriste La RCT était sur les formes graves et les décès. Première bêtise. https://t.co/mlTWQxnS3f
@Diego77197524 @licenciaro @PatriciaJMadrid @Dr_Julio_Medina Seguís demostrando q no tenés la más p u t.a idea de lo q hablas. Terapia experimental?Difícil q sea experimental si pasó x todas las fases. Y más vale q no vayas a decir del tiempo q necesitan l
@Jay78794784 @AlexisPhilo L'ivrogne fournit, en guise de preuve, une question d'un politicien. En quoi c'est une preuve ? Sinon, tu peux lire l'article scientifique, tocard 🤡 https://t.co/2bRLPehFQn
@MikkoKorhonen12 @Valtssu @IsoHenkka @Yleisradio With approximately 19,000 participants per group in the subset of participants with a median follow-up time of 2 months after the second dose, https://t.co/Vp5xbZgHqM
@WayneSh73625447 @niko1963 @CaulfieldTim @CarlaKJohnson Here is a scientific study on the Pfizer vaccine. https://t.co/pj3389BpRd
Dr Roper lies
@HugoHebR @metallimoi Tout débat avec ce genre de personne ne peut qu' être stérile,elle utilise encore l'argument du 95% d'efficacité contre l'infection pour Pfizer alors qu' il a été démontré que les injections de l'étude clinique n'étaient pas celles qu
@EBur300 @mrjohntee @ADevotedYogi @ChrisWh53353405 @TJ60002076415 @Or1ginalSandman @badboujeebabee The fact you're still saying this is galling. If you're a barrister, you should be capable of using your brain, applying some critical thinking, and learning
You are quoting data that turned out to be false. It was 95 % effective until it wasn't.
@BartiSkip @NickHudsonCT @CartlandDavid Here is Pfizer's own test of their covid 'vaccine"https://t.co/jh7oTG3ERB It says 162 out of 21,728 people in the placebo group caught covid. 172 divided by 21728 = 0.74%. So fewer than 1 in 100 who DIDN'T get vacc
@suzi91051512 @liz_churchill10 All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinat
@Babysmoking @liz_churchill10 All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinate
@SuzanneReads @nomdk1 @liz_churchill10 All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo
@SR_AK @liz_churchill10 All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated cont
@WatsonSpeaking @DawnTJ90 @DocDeezWhat @GretaS4886 @thehealthb0t No - the clinical trials are complete. The were in 2020/2021. We’ve been over this
@WatsonSpeaking @ProfDuckDuckGo @GretaS4886 @thehealthb0t Sure let me help you https://t.co/ATCYtEQ6ER
@ProfDuckDuckGo @GretaS4886 @thehealthb0t Based upon the data you provided HOW LONG was the total study? https://t.co/Or9mcwwUlH
@EBur300 @ChrisWh53353405 @ADevotedYogi @Or1ginalSandman @mrjohntee @badboujeebabee Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% protection against symptomatic infection (getting sick
@HerbsandDirt All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good
@dc_stephane @lonnibesancon AMM = fin de l'expérimentation. Les mots ont un sens et le circuit du médicament a des règles précises. Phase 3 terminée en 2020 et publiée début décembre 2020 : https://t.co/5IvWgLZ2cM
@EricMeller @RobPMurphy Seems like there were quite a few RCTs, can't send it to find the results you claimed. Not in this one anyway. https://t.co/9tyRbNpInM
@k_urb1 @gvenugopalan @Debunk_the_Funk So much for "doing your own research." 🙄🙄🙄 https://t.co/E9jPS6a4aQ
@mullerbaby6 Cool so you are another person who claims to be a critical thinker, where in fact it is more of a bias hunter, who has really done no research behind the narratives you hear that supports such bias. There was evidence researcher. https://t.c
@cgstoker @VigilantFox pfizer published their results in Dec 2020 and you can still read them https://t.co/tk3YFa2gr6
@STRAT777 @DrJanKirsch You are trying to gaslight me into thinking I have not read the studies? Fun fact, I even pinned it if you want to read it for once
@blind_dumb @wideawake_media @AstraZeneca @pfizer @Keir_Starmer Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% protection against symptomatic infection, and published the results in the
@Keldran T’es con ou quoi ? Lol « efficacité sur quoi» Tu sais lire ? J’espère qu’ils ont de meilleurs avocats que pour leurs 99 procès perdus en justice rien qu’aux US où ils ont payer 11 milliards $ d’amende pour leurs mensonges et corruption depuis 2
@Keldran C’est l’étude Pfizer publiée, tu manges du foin matin midi et soir pour ne pas saisir ? « Sur et efficace » Lol https://t.co/2quUFZLIeV https://t.co/egwDw5LK4Y
@Keldran ET GRAND JE T’AI ENVOYÉ L’ÉTUDE JE RECOMMENCE PUISQUE TU NE LIS RIEN. Vivement les résultats des procédures en cours en justice! https://t.co/2quUFZLIeV https://t.co/kTDrV7eaJT
@Keldran DONC TU PARLES D’UN SUJET DONT TU N’AS JAMAIS LU L’ÉTUDE? Lol Vivement les verdicts des procès en cours ! Après 99 condamnations depuis 2000 rien qu’aux US pour Pfizer et 11 milliards $ d’amendes payés par Pfizer en justice ! https://t.co/2quUF
@PeterHotez @too_secrets thanks. Here is a link to the Biontech Ph. 3 testresults that have been published in a very timely manner https://t.co/0mHFPGRlZ3 In contrast to the corbevax ph. 3 incomplete test results that have been published 18 months late. Wa
@shoved_right @FluffyPony69_ @AlexMacDonaldjr @vitamindees @CaulfieldTim Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% protection against symptomatic infection, and published the resul
Hey Tayler, here’s the safety data. https://t.co/jALA76RVpx
@IOHK_Charles @ryglerka @OceanFXSHO @cardanostra and here is the P3 trial before you try to tell me it wasn't tested. https://t.co/ZmTDdKx2fK
@WayneWi70815642 @Freedum_Crybaby @BarryYoungNZ It was published Dec 10, 2020. Pfizer has always said their trial didn't look at transmission. They didn't "admit" anything when they said it again, nor did anyone lie about it. https://t.co/RSyNxjPyR8
@robertmitrenga1 @JansPost @iederzijnW @SteviesQuotes Kan u mij even een link geven naar die succesvol afgeronde klinische testfase aub? Sure, geen probleem: https://t.co/O6CPGGj2bS
@boianspeaks @doctorofinfo @RealJonTSmith @michigan2024nat @yay_its_james show where they tested for infection and transmission. https://t.co/Zp9ffUi9bg
@harukane @velasco_reguera Probada en más de 40000 voluntarios😁https://t.co/Wvf2Z3gJRY
@Max_Palmeri @kos_6561 https://t.co/Ltt2MLBAvS No, proprio no, ma è risaputo che Cosentino è un cazzaro.
@dmancann @hexles @nzdsos I've read most of the vaccines' clinical trials, you assumed I hadn't. Vaccines work by reducing serious illness and death, anyone suggesting that vaccines stopped all transmission got it wrong. https://t.co/wmJKgj7NjR
@MatDeFleuriot I’m glad you admitted you have no scientific experience
@itsEFlyX @TeamFactsMatter @OfficialMediaCo @BLXCK2THEFUTURE @BlackAliensXyz @ProfDuckDuckGo He claimed his study was hidden It was published in 2020 publicly and for free https://t.co/OTgWw87sRn
@itsEFlyX @TeamFactsMatter @OfficialMediaCo @BLXCK2THEFUTURE @BlackAliensXyz @ProfDuckDuckGo @SpaceX He's trying to claim this study was hidden It was published in 2020 https://t.co/OTgWw87sRn
RT @ROM91407635: @osojio @azukiglg お前らって自分がやらないからってそもそも不可能かやっちゃ駄目な実験モデルばかり提案するよな? 机上の空論というのよそれ。 あとそういう『思い込みによるブレ』という条件を揃える為にどちらにも中身を伝えず投与す…
RT @ROM91407635: @osojio @azukiglg お前らって自分がやらないからってそもそも不可能かやっちゃ駄目な実験モデルばかり提案するよな? 机上の空論というのよそれ。 あとそういう『思い込みによるブレ』という条件を揃える為にどちらにも中身を伝えず投与す…
@osojio @azukiglg お前らって自分がやらないからってそもそも不可能かやっちゃ駄目な実験モデルばかり提案するよな? 机上の空論というのよそれ。 あとそういう『思い込みによるブレ』という条件を揃える為にどちらにも中身を伝えず投与するのが二重盲検法なんだけど? https://t.co/HiAvsY1YZR
@MatDeFleuriot So these childhood vaccines were not run vs placebo? Sure, pal IF you had ANY scientific experience you would know how to read COVID Phase I/II -> https://t.co/At4RRjdpoG and Phase II/III randomized clinical trials -> https://t.co/S6
@BigBlockBuickGS @sjs856 @HamHead5813 Here you go. Besides your being wrong about the EUA requirements, there would need to be an RCT for HCQ and Ivermectin showing efficacy for them to get an EUA. https://t.co/M12p1hWzgp(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20dose,vaccine
@FloydJethro69 @Max_Palmeri @RoyDeVita https://t.co/Ltt2MLB2Gk Non drogarti, studia
@dmancann @hexles @nzdsos You have clearly been misinformed, and seem to be trying to misinform others. Vaccines are designed to reduce serious illness and death. https://t.co/1Ekxt04Ihy
@dmancann @hexles @nzdsos Yes, I've read several clinical trials. I've linked Pfizer's clinical trials released Dec 2020, for your reference. Real world effectiveness is always lower, though still good according to many independent studies. https://t.co/
RT @RealWsiegrist: Zwei Schlussfolgerungen und beide kreuzfalsch, obwohl im prestigeträchtigsten medizinischen Journal publiziert NEJM 202…
RT @RealWsiegrist: Zwei Schlussfolgerungen und beide kreuzfalsch, obwohl im prestigeträchtigsten medizinischen Journal publiziert NEJM 202…
Zwei Schlussfolgerungen und beide kreuzfalsch, obwohl im prestigeträchtigsten medizinischen Journal publiziert NEJM 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615. https://t.co/w2zZ6Jvfth Schlussfolgerungen: Eine Zweifach-Impfung mit BNT162b2 gewährte Personen ab 16 Jah
@l47483 @axbelund I de fall där det inte finns någon standardbehandling används ofta saltlösning. Som exempelvis MRNa-vaccinen... https://t.co/RsotzhNQzc