@sam_elect @An7hony331 @HiddenPinky The vaccines went through the same safety testing as every other vaccine. For example, here's a human clinical trial of a COVID vaccine from 2020. https://t.co/A09mpJ2yJY
@sam_elect @Zaphod_2022a @HiddenPinky https://t.co/wFd80ihMs9 what untested vaccine? why do anti-vaxxers not do their research? they want everyone else to do their work for them. lol
@coach28373 @mcfunny @thisisnothappen @davidakirkwood1 @ICanLookThatUp @Awithonelison @kevinault @CarsonMerkwan I can link it again. RFK claimed NONE OF this existed. Yet, here you and I can easily read it. It even mentions the earlier safety profile f
@patriottmom2one @QuietFriendly @WhiteJoshuaL It doesn't matter what I say, you'll never accept any real-world source, but here's an abbreviated list... U Maryland: https://t.co/b2BzlMfwu7 NIH general testing: https://t.co/ZYcXQShmZn NIH clinical trials: h
@HamHead5813 @Debunk_the_Funk these are studies after the initial trials. Yes trials review safety and efficacy concurrently, as clearly stated in the publication You really are totally confused https://t.co/tk3YFa2gr6
@moi_hurtado @ChakNorris93 Esta es tan solo la primera publicación científica sobre seguridad y eficacia de las vacunas. Después de esta hay cientos más. https://t.co/Wvf2Z3gc2q
@quickstics @DrSuneelDhand The Pfizer trial showed 95% efficacy. Read it here: https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@VcastV @pensamientcrit Hay cientos de ellas . Le aporto los resultados de seguridad y eficacia de los ensayos clínicos tras los cuales hay cientos más en sectores de edad y población variada. Espero luego los suyos que demuestren las muertes provocadas po
@The_Real_Ref @robyperanibg72 @Max_Palmeri No, i numeri del trial pfizer sono questi: https://t.co/CKwiRK9jxL E' che il nostro amico "diversamente intelligente" storpia volutamente i dati. https://t.co/Wj3PuJGYbI
@Max_Palmeri Era difficile storpiare i dati in maniera così da cog**ne, ma lei c'è riuscito, complimenti. Non era facile. Questi, invece, i dati reali: Curva rossa vaccinati, curva blu non vaccinati. Figura vuota sono i casi, figura piena sono i deces
@Max_Palmeri Ovviamente non è il modo corretto di esporre i risultati. Il placebo non ha protetto nessuno Il vaccino ha evitato 19 infezioni su 20 I numeri da te citati dipendono da quanto sta circolando il virus e da quanto tempo aspetti per vedere infez
@ffert2907 @StevePascolo @Annette_LEXA @raoult_didier Les tests ont été faits et présentés par BioNTech. Insuffisants ? 44000 personnes enrôlées. Connaissez-vous un autre traitement plus testé ? Contestable ? Faits ? >des preuves de ça ! Service htt
@Art0fficiall @Debunk_the_Funk @TigerlillySusan Evidently you didn't read the conclusion that I posted. You obviously didn't read the trial reports themselves, e.g. https://t.co/4xeZ89eoGL
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/fiM8CLlNQt
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
@VukVelesov @Slavica95312023 @Jella23268386 Proverite podatke, ko vam brani? Naučne studije su javno dostupne u naučnim publikacijama, svako može da proveri i ponovi istraživanja u datim uslovima. Evo za 4 vakcine u Srbiji https://t.co/4WStlCsAkc iRNK tehn
RT @2023Masaya: この話はHPVワクチンの例の白い分厚い本に同じことが書かれていたことが記憶しています。 なので、ワクチンそのものではなく、添加されているものが問題なのかとツイートしたことがありました。
@Kanga7577 @Shannon77683528 @BassonBrain @wideawake_media I’ve read lots. I even read this, which you claimed I was just making up. I read the one after that too. And the one after that. https://t.co/f0W1V4zJw5
@blower07_rex @Enough71364045 @1_southernmiss @AlertChannel Here is the phase 3 trial results https://t.co/tk3YFa2gr6
@Erin_Fren @thevegdoc You can't lie your way out of this
@Kanga7577 @Shannon77683528 @BassonBrain @wideawake_media Published in the New England Journal of Medicine in December, 2020. https://t.co/f0W1V4zJw5
RT @biti_zdrav: Kažu necivilizovani da su vakcine eksperimentalne i neispitane. 🤷 Ista tema u petoj godini od početka pandemije.🤦 Od 50+ od…
Niz koji sadrži naučne studije i podatke o vakcinama protiv kovida 19 i SARS-CoV-2 virusa. https://t.co/28YRJ8JMZO
RT @biti_zdrav: Kažu necivilizovani da su vakcine eksperimentalne i neispitane. 🤷 Ista tema u petoj godini od početka pandemije.🤦 Od 50+ od…
RT @hanan052020: @meeeemet @dokter_kampung Mas ahmad.. bisa baca paper ini kan ya.. What do u think of this paper? Apa critical point dari…
@teodul888 @Slavica95312023 Svoje homoseksualne fantazije slobodno zadržite za sebe i vaše sličnomišljenike. Na vašu žalost, sve su vakcine ispitane. https://t.co/3G6HMHZZXO Do decembra 2022. bilo je 50 odobrenih vakcina, 242 koje se ispituju u 821 studiji
Kažu necivilizovani da su vakcine eksperimentalne i neispitane. 🤷 Ista tema u petoj godini od početka pandemije.🤦 Od 50+ odobrenih vakcina, koje to nisu ispitane? 1. Podaci svih vakcina do 2. 12. 2022. https://t.co/cLOnz9ZNQH 2. Pfizer-BioNtech BNT162b2 h
@Jon_in_TX @cstephens959 @ginacarano This is honestly a work of art. Thank you. Robust, peer reviewed clinical data. Published *four years ago*: https://t.co/pXoHbeqSeQ https://t.co/0BFUmCaZoN
@MilanSimeunovi9 Ne, gospodine. To je bio teror nevakcinisanih i antivaksera u čijim telima su prirodni rezervoari za nove mutacije i sojeve virusa. Zbog takvih (uglavnom) se i pandemija otegla i odnela dosta žrtava. Vakcine su ispitane, svaka od pedeseta
@RidQuantumDrive @Stphani77858269 @silvano_trotta Dc vs affirmez... puis vs fuyez 🤣 Bah commencez par ça chaton ; https://t.co/23nqsIK1TR
@ChrisDodwell01 @chrischirp @Otto_English While I hardly love pharma companies, what you’ve heard isn’t true. The results have been public since December 2020. https://t.co/WrNZjuOuY9 The “75 years” thing: https://t.co/8md6fouqxt
@RealJermWarfare @OxfordSaffa @keiron1973 No. Plenty. Let’s start with an obvious one. https://t.co/bse4DYg0PZ
@Livythinker Perché all' inizio hanno dimostrato che era sicuro ed efficace. https://t.co/dSUdTKho7r
@4CPcomics https://t.co/VtUjBiyyLm I don't want to play grievance games right now. I've had a long day, and you are jumping through conversations at a rate that I'm just not interested in. Going back to your original point, WA state took a good strategy, a
@ChrisCuomo Wrong! Dr Birx! The Jab was NEVER studied to reduce hospitalization and death. It was studied to reduce SYMPTOMS ! Enough lying! https://t.co/VlX3eI9IPY
@TimothyNuell @WotsOnInfo @DotWolmarans Try sneezing through a mask. Masks work by REDUCING the emission of aerosols and droplets which contain pathogens. More silliness by you, this time about vaccines. https://t.co/4ygv1aIYPp
@TheoFleury14 All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good
@FreedomReigns2 @DrSusanOliver1 No, it was shown in a clinical trial. Your ignorance to how things work isn’t evidence. It is not the medical and scientific community’s fault that you are willfully ignorant. https://t.co/aLTzWbuamt
@jrdufil @fichotnicole Vous recopiez bien la merde des réseaux sociaux, mais vous pourriez aussi faire vos propres recherche. Essai de phase 3 publié en bonne et due forme en novembre 2020. https://t.co/mlTWQxnS3f
@Moosepiss1 @BreezerGalway @_graymatterpod @NicotineLozeng Pfizer P3 trial - Dec 2020 🤡 https://t.co/IPkpHn8Eub https://t.co/DgBgMCRxzE
@robdawg925 @Kevin_McKernan @edenstanwarr @thereal_truther @Debunk_the_Funk @IanCopeland5 @RobertKennedyJr Link to the above text. It’s literally the first trailer in a search for “Pfeizer Covid study data”. Look under adverse effects heading. https://t.co
@robdawg925 @thereal_truther @Debunk_the_Funk @IanCopeland5 @RobertKennedyJr That's not how vaccine efficacy is calculated. From Table 3 in the clinical trial results, overall proportion in vaccinated group is 8/17411. In placebo group, 162/17511. Divide v
@BGatesIsaPyscho LOLOLOLOLOL. Scientists didn't lie. Vaccines are safe and effective. https://t.co/7B6S4eEfSK
@5shezz4 @doomannihilator @G_l_i_t_c_h_e_d We have learned a lot from this novel virus, but that doesn't mean the original vaccine didn't have a benefit. https://t.co/7B6S4eEfSK
@CFarandaH @yay_its_james @Ofcom What on Earth are you talking about? Here is the Pfizer trial. Show me where these trial subjects were allegedly dropped, and point out the fraud. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@fichotnicole @leaberyl @Jeannemarie1309 @Yinfeng09 @carmobra69 @JoVazco @Acermendax Vous avez gobé ça ? 😂😂😂 Vous vous êtes fait couillonner. Voici l'etude Pfizer phase 3, listant les effets indésirables connus à date, avec analyse bénéfices risques. Nov
@man_marrow @dense_evi @SkyNews Who do you think is 'my news organisation'? All deaths were reported in the clinical trials report and supplementary data. "No deaths were considered by the investigators to be related to the vaccine or placebo." https://
RT @hanan052020: @meeeemet @dokter_kampung Mas ahmad.. bisa baca paper ini kan ya.. What do u think of this paper? Apa critical point dari…
RT @hanan052020: @meeeemet @dokter_kampung Mas ahmad.. bisa baca paper ini kan ya.. What do u think of this paper? Apa critical point dari…
RT @hanan052020: @LtdAkbar Sampai sekrg ga nongol 👇 https://t.co/6ozBqdjYQ3
@GiggaMAGA Start here.. https://t.co/nE2KyTXKDF
@ptpasta Like this: https://t.co/nE2KyTXKDF
@gertiekeddle @KonjinS84640 @MrsMertes Habe 2021 u.a. gelesen, "No deaths were considered by the investigators to be related to the vaccine or placebo. No Covid-19–associated deaths were observed." https://t.co/2ISt6gFSKV
RT @hanan052020: @meeeemet @dokter_kampung Mas ahmad.. bisa baca paper ini kan ya.. What do u think of this paper? Apa critical point dari…
@LtdAkbar Sampai sekrg ga nongol 👇 https://t.co/6ozBqdjYQ3
@michellespj I'm happy to discuss as an example what Fauci said in great detail. I'm not saying that false statements were not made. For example, the clinical trials clearly showed that vaccines did not stop transmission. https://t.co/EdaNs7VXIy
@murrill7577 @MdBreathe @RealAlexJones That is a silly claim. Clinical trials released 10 Dec 2020 showed conclusively that the mRNA vaccines did not stop transmission. https://t.co/EdaNs7VXIy
@MdBreathe @goddeketal Agreed! It was obviously in the clinical trials that a small number got Covid, and transmitted the virus. That was 10 Dec 2020! https://t.co/bolfd5k6oR
@goddeketal Yep. For science, it is best to listen to scientists. Specifically, what is written in peer reviewed papers. https://t.co/bolfd5k6oR
@ThemangisJason Yep. For science, I listen to scientists. It is a shame more people don't. https://t.co/bolfd5k6oR
@SovSoulMel @stopthepurge1 @wearegoodmenj6 Here is one Google Scholar source. You might also find some reports where there are yet unknowns. https://t.co/5t0BZvzjZ6
@LesterSonne @ifbacongrewont1 @mjtimber2 @DavidPryce69098 @Unlikely_Buddha @capnstarlight That's a weird post, it is almost as if you haven't read the clinical trials. Vaccines reduce the number of infected people who get Covid, and for most, the severity
@ifbacongrewont1 @mjtimber2 @LesterSonne @DavidPryce69098 @Unlikely_Buddha @capnstarlight ...if you are talking about vaccines stopping all transmission, that's hilariously wrong... ...which was known on the clinical trials, released 10 Dec 2020. Only the
@nmhchamp @PigletDragon Please tell me what issues you find with the science in this paper? https://t.co/nE2KyTXKDF
@AzoteFriki @KAkosombo Ya te gustaría a ti, memo https://t.co/wm8EdSYpPn
@peat_ross_ @loveletters2007 @julie_kelly2 Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% effectiveness against symptomatic infection, and published the results in the New England Journ
RT @NiusMarco: Lien https://t.co/NP7XYWhN9B et Rapport final https://t.co/6fKdadCrb1 8ieme fichier page 132 (en Vert ce sont les gens du gr…
@CER_OF_AUT @salud71385 @amcalber https://t.co/Wvf2Z3gc2q. Más de 40000 voluntarios. Lea
@LoveDaveyB @JaneHogarth84 @schram_marCo2hx @NaysGarden @yay_its_james It really isn’t hard to Google this.
@myrachmia @alfarabi_alva @dokter_kampung baru mau minta bahas paper dibawah ini tp sdh ngilang? 😅🤷♂️ https://t.co/wM6OpQItZs
@StatChrisCotton Exactement ! Comme le mentionnait aussi Pfizer dans le research summary de l’étude de départ ! https://t.co/SJXLMr1fTT A l’époque, ils avaient lu, au moins ! https://t.co/0WwJpvMjyC
@Runningmansuzie @thereal_truther I know that is simply untrue. The adverse events, known at the time of the completion of the Phase 3 trial among the 21,000 receiving the vaccines, are right there in the findings. Scroll down to Reactogenicity. https://
RT @NiusMarco: Lien https://t.co/NP7XYWhN9B et Rapport final https://t.co/6fKdadCrb1 8ieme fichier page 132 (en Vert ce sont les gens du gr…
@TonyMacaroni22 @OTURISK My expectation was that docotrs would read this. https://t.co/u9otGuDSgX
これが治験? たった二回打って二週間しか観察してねえじゃん 治験って何かそもそも分かってないのかな?