@RB84509962 @MauritzPreller @jsm2334 @sco0psmcgoo @MonthlySandwich @dr_jon_l @LowCard_Hunger @BarryYoungNZ Here is one of the trials. https://t.co/aLTzWbuamt
@Silver_Lining76 @BerryTartlet @sjs856 December 2020 https://t.co/tD1STINAHX Please provide a peer reviewed study which concludes the vaccines are NOT safe & effective. Study must be large N and include toxicology and genetic studies. If you do f a
@AudioAdvent @zap_lock @pureblazejp Here is a slice of salami. The original Pfizer trials. https://t.co/TwixPx2xED
@GolfElkLife @jimeekay @The_JAY_N_G @DrSusanOliver1 It is mathematically proven to do exactly that. Keep posting irrelevant nonsense - it corresponds with you thought process. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@IsDatEchtZo5 @dancalegria @mkeulemans Jij kunt niet zoeken ? Sukkel. Dat duurt 2 seconden. Pfff …. Ik zal nog maar eens mijn goede wil tonen … 👇 https://t.co/5eXFhbcvGj
@GolfElkLife @jimeekay @The_JAY_N_G @DrSusanOliver1 The education system has totally failed you. Demand refund. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@shouldbenewsap @VeteranGaming75 @goddeketal The same source @goddeketal is referring to! #antivaxxers will gobble up anything that supports their narrative but dismiss the same source that doesn't. Pfizer released the Phase 3 Trial data, which you'll dis
@KatharinaL001 @veit_markus @gigabente @maithi_nk @maithinkx Die sieht irgendwie auch anders aus https://t.co/KRW2pxoDvk
@CazadorSzarrrrr Here’s the “no data” for Covid vaccines. 🙄 https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@weaponizedwheat I can provide you the one thing you will never be able to do. https://t.co/9VYrTdhIiU
@weaponizedwheat all day long https://t.co/9VYrTdhIiU
@stkirsch Yes, there are counterexamples. Read it and weep. You're proven wrong again. https://t.co/LFghi9sFU8
@Brainsurfing22 @nycfreethinker @DrPaulOffit We are talking about one that was tested in one of the largest RCTs ever run and was against a saline placebo. So you’re in favor of the Covid vaccines as they meet this criteria. https://t.co/FJJJaMMTru https:/
@BenSmit81581660 All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, g
RT @lonnibesancon: @docdu16 Je suppose que la traduction de "safe and effective" n'est pas sur et efficace alors? https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0…
RT @lonnibesancon: @docdu16 Je suppose que la traduction de "safe and effective" n'est pas sur et efficace alors? https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0…
@docdu16 Je suppose que la traduction de "safe and effective" n'est pas sur et efficace alors? https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0 https://t.co/fGRXaVxWfM https://t.co/cqn00DJAjj J'écris de ce pas au New England et à BMJ qui visiblement ne savent pas de quoi ils par
@KirMt5491 @WokeVirtueSignl @doctorofinfo @skepticalraptor Gates was on about “key goals” in 2020 Vaccine trials don’t test for transmission. Antivaxxers can’t read December 2020⬇️ https://t.co/IPkpHn8Eub https://t.co/5NFOPVv9Nn
@TheRedPillPharm @SoniaPoulton @tntradiolive Here is the phase III Pfizer trial, use Google to find all the others. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@LBower32390965 @xeal_ @DataJames124875 @kiddkainmusic @rohangilkes @IanCopeland5 @JesslovesMJK @HDrsslr 1. You are trying to rewrite history to justify your mistakes and blame others for your gullibility. 2. The vaccine effectiveness was well publicised
@cedean99 @mama4mito @annmforti Except I am not. The primary endpoint of the trial, which they were 95% effective at, was prevention of symptomatic COVID. There was no statistical significance in the number of people with severe adverse reactions and death
@FnqSilver @jasonkilanski @realstewpeters Again the actual study x https://t.co/iuJ7TrW8gL
@FnqSilver The actual study 😉 https://t.co/iuJ7TrW8gL
RT @adiosmuchachos4: @FnqSilver @KAOS8688 You mean this study ? lol https://t.co/iuJ7TrW8gL
@FnqSilver @KAOS8688 You mean this study ? lol https://t.co/iuJ7TrW8gL
@Frank8045668739 Explain this in detail or get blocked: https://t.co/FGwEUJ0hub(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20dose,vaccine%20efficacy%20greater%20than%2030%25.
@germ_nations @DannyGavita Wait but none of that is true. When you lie about matters of science & medicine, it gets people killed. How do you explain this? Address the content of the publication directly. https://t.co/FGwEUJ0hub(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20do
@SalvadorSituat1 @doctorofinfo @Asandry4 @mbnaturopath Here you go, dummy. https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@More_Plato @rohangilkes @IanCopeland5 Unreal. OK - critique these: https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@bluebeetle_one @TRyanGregory Yeah that isn't contentious. And I'm happy to show you. Where do you want to start? https://t.co/fbxDCZj5MC Have you seen this one before? it was referenced for the 95% effective claim if you remember that. Still not retrac
@charbonnie41003 @lonnibesancon @charbonnie41003 Voilà pour commencer les études d'efficacité et de safety sur lesquelles nous nous sommes basés. Bonne lecture https://t.co/jdOBix1jSY https://t.co/y8BBw837NN https://t.co/6GumrU7JQf https://t.co/8uDA3BOKfF
@CK_Hessen Gar nichts wurde "offengelegt", die Daten waren schon vor dem Leak öffentlich zugänglich. Pfizer / Biontech haben die Ergebnisse der Phase III Studie im Dezember 2020 im New England Journal of Medicine veröffentlicht. https://t.co/QWMi0ic9gu
@RobH013 Here you go; https://t.co/nE2KyTXKDF
@Momwith3gr8kids @BusyDrT https://t.co/30aahPVG5k Want anymore?
@Mutant_Heretic @BarbM_76 @MargoLogan @IanCopeland5 Here, you can read about it. https://t.co/puH464rzrD
@Heydjee @ZeTotor @3nixl0mix4 @Jer_Homme @o_d_e_c @AROBASEUR Desolé petit mais je vais te montrer une vraie source. https://t.co/tpPUp4YvsK Il est marqué "OBSERVER BLINDED " et pas "DOUBLE BLINDED". CE QUI RUINE TOUT (les patients connaissent le placebo
@TRyanGregory @statonomic Here’s a start https://t.co/6KSTy000CM “BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19”
@DrJanKirsch All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good
@MrJNexusSTHLM Can you point to your specific criticisms here? Include a discussion of the robustness of the methodology and the statistical power of the data. https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@87cr250r @SeanConwayACT @Canna4Shop @JohntheLyricist Here is the RCT in question: https://t.co/v2Cx5JU1tp This according to you, is the gold standard for evidence. Let's see how you weasel out of this one.
@HollyR38288 So you’re really good at posting lay sources but what about this paper: what do you find wrong with the methods and conclusions: https://t.co/nE2KyTXKDF
@18DellaLia37961 @TorySnyc You can read the trials online. Here's the Pfizer trial to get you started. Who is "they"? Phase IV trials are post-marketing surveillance. Do you know anything at all about drug development? https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@CanalhasDoBem @NielsendoBrasil @MysteriousArt12 @Quem_e_Satoshi Vamos começar a aula cedo hoje. Essa data não quer dizer nada, assim como no clinicaltrial aparece a data de 2024. O estudo está terminado quando ele atinge os desfechos/objetivos que ele pre
@alex_tremist @Franck20270 EI détectés lors de la phase 3 des vaccins Pfizer, publié en décembre 2020, je ne refais pas l'histoire apprenez à lire. https://t.co/889RJZHLw0 https://t.co/JAfEm1LF1R
Malas noticias para los inoculados: El estudio de Pfizer que anunciaba una eficacia del 95% y justificó la campaña de "vacunación" finaliza su fase 3 y da una eficacia en 2 años del -30%. FUENTES👇 https://t.co/q88bg77Qgr https://t.co/8rXRvbNFyP 8º archivo
@HollandsJu37848 @HiimMe27 @Sayin_It_Now @SJWilliams123 https://t.co/XBjCTCUSXx This is a more considered look at the matter from Dec 2020. This isn’t a quick read and does appropriately help disseminate the slightly basic worded question you’re posing.
@PatFuller598675 @IanCopeland5 @didaskeptic You mean this study? https://t.co/mIdi6mfSts
@Ken__kaneki33 @loulou2745 @Polaris19710 @ScienceParle_SW Je t’en ai posté plein mais tu les as soigneusement évitées 😬 Tiens
@Ken__kaneki33 @FLAHAULT @dreffon @ansm Là, tu as plein d’études:
@Ken__kaneki33 @loulou2745 @Polaris19710 @ScienceParle_SW Tiens, voilà des études qui concluent à la sûreté des vaccins: https://t.co/KWCBbHRNIl https://t.co/qz4q2Yief6 https://t.co/bYPnhuVdvP https://t.co/mlwImyjjwk https://t.co/FVFeX4jR8e https://t
@FreeManOnEarth9 @FloorBound84 @_APWK_ That’s a real softball. https://t.co/FJJJaMMTru 500,000 pages of documents on it. https://t.co/FlhsAYU6z8 Do you even know anything about the Kopchinski case? You think a $2.3 bil judgement is small now? For adverti
@Ken__kaneki33 @Polaris19710 @ScienceParle_SW @loulou2745 Revoici l’étude de 2020 https://t.co/R8QO1vOyBU https://t.co/Vwue2ZAZTz
@nerdyJohnConnor @DrJanKirsch @JusticeForFacts @BRSTest1 So what's this then? https://t.co/PbNOOvfeUH
@diseasy_e @JonathanHannah @robinmonotti Not sure why its relevant to the above, but sure. https://t.co/PteJcqhpFg
@ShadyNeutron @DaveJustino @FreeRebel1973 @MdBreathe Easy, these documents are all publicly available https://t.co/u1VvDLDdLq I don’t know why you posted that phmpt link but I know they didn’t do the testing https://t.co/Z5pFaOn9rp
@Deevoee @Freddyveritas @ukIemons @FiveTimesAugust Are you seriously this crazy or just auditioning for a part in the town play? https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@Runningmansuzie @MurielBlaivePhD Is that what you read in the TikTok Times or the Instagram Inquirer? You actually believe both of these were "faked"? And the dozens that came after them? And the hundreds of cohort studies after these? https://t.co/S2miJ
@bostonsupremacy @crabb_vicki Shit for brains: before the covid vaccine was released there were two randomized placebo controlled trails in more than 75,000 people. They are here: By the way, actual studies are published in scientific journals - not Facebo
@Gish19382 Really. Please enlighten me: where has this paper gone wrong? https://t.co/nE2KyTXKDF
@borncurious369 @adamwburns @IanCopeland5 @P_J_Buckhaults @Kevin_McKernan Here are the first two RCTs before the vaccine was even released. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@mothrfunkr @CazadorsCat @southheadkiwi @GetSchwifyinere Nope. Rather than “I think” and believing whatever bitchute, why don’t you look at the study. It was unblinded because it was unethical beyond the point of EUA
@mothrfunkr @CazadorsCat @southheadkiwi @GetSchwifyinere Rather than believing whatever bitchute videos tell you, why don’t you look at the study on the trial itself? https://t.co/nllMjSWhu1
RT @Egocapcher: @DrJBhattacharya @realLongWangMD It's not obvious to the average person. Can you point out one red flag for educational pu…
@Lord_Talbot64 @DavidHu05137188 @Arwenstar You are a deluded fool. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@DrJBhattacharya @realLongWangMD It's not obvious to the average person. Can you point out one red flag for educational purposes? https://t.co/yYkIsX3rIj
RT @DrJBhattacharya: This clip is infuriating. It is an admission of public health malpractice by the @CDCDirector. The main clinical en…
@ByronHsu2 @approfre @RobertKennedyJr This is link on EUA approval based on SAME study but EUA has way more data disclosed! it is famous paper https://t.co/t2qE5gZdI9 Tell me you don't see these numbers in there? Tell me it is not the same study?
@BTC_ChadHodl @anders_hviid @Debunk_the_Funk @TheChiefNerd Please cite your claims. Yes, the vaccines are effective against symptomatic COVID-19 infections. They are most effective against severe disease. It’s the severe disease that overwhelms our health
@DMushtuk @guaro_20 @MariusManea_org @toobaffled You mean to say you get your empirical science from bitchute because you can’t understand the actual empirical science? Like this paper: https://t.co/nE2KyTXKDF
@yutanpa151849 トンチンカンな反論でなかったことは説明済みですよ。 それに、ここでもう触れなくてもいいと言ったのに触れてきたのはあなたですし。
Le donne incinte e che allattavano sono state escluse dagli studi clinici di fase III originali di Pregnant and breastfeeding women were excluded from the original Pfizer Pfizere and Moderna Moderna, quindi qualsiasi raccomandazione 🪝 https://t.co/vNOhZULg
@Activist1One @SolNataMD Read & enjoy. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@GamblerRestless @yay_its_james Are you #%^&#ing kidding? Start here - there are dozens and dozens more. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
RT @CarlosVecino4: FUENTES: • Enlace a los resultados iniciales de eficacia de Pfizer, diciembre/2020 https://t.co/tRGYqs5Cxl • Informe…
@mxcooper517
@yutanpa151849 コロナワクチンの効果はこの論文で示されてますよ。まあ話が逸れてるのでこれについてはもう触れなくてもいいですが。 https://t.co/lIn6V3nI8T https://t.co/PQeMQRFWwF
@IamwhatIam_now @Beiblrieder Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | NEJM https://t.co/TwYCqEk7Y5
@GamblerRestless @yay_its_james Shared this with you yesterday, Gambler. You went silent.
@appyman @Arwenstar This is just you regurgitating antivax lies. Yes, properly tested. They underwent full clinical trials. They demonstrated safety and efficacy in them. They were placebo controlled: https://t.co/iF66osvAef https://t.co/u3wBUwITwF Y