RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
@Golfergirl2018 @yerbooti65358 @glenpyle This one and scroll down to Adverse Events in which the conclusive safety reports were supposed to be revealed in 2 years which is January 2023...where is it??😎 https://t.co/FN6TeW4eMP
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
@TRACEYBTHIERRY @AfpFactuel Ben si. Il était mentionné dans l'étude initiale sortie en décembre que cet aspect n'avait pas été étudié, ou précisément si le vaccin protégeait contre la transmission aux non vax. Mais là encore, on ne transmet pas une maladi
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
@palple @Doc_Gio_ Dici questo studio? https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB Beh, veramente afferma il contrario, boccalona
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
RT @PeterHotez: 5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%)…
5/n both mRNA vaccines were approved on their ability to prevent symptomatic infection, which they were very good at (95%) in large well designed clinical trials. Here’s the paper in NEJM for Pfizer BioNTech vaccine https://t.co/W9gKU94PBj
@dmduncan2010 @upsonp64 Therefore your issue seems to be with *other* people. Perhaps you have a short memory, or perhaps you’re too focussed on some strange “doggy doctor” trope to read actual papers. https://t.co/xaY08415wd
@STRAT777 @GaryF56698701 @SarahCaul_ONS @stkirsch @pfizer (1/2) Per the trial (https://t.co/DQOEJ2t1j3) fever was considered a possible COVID symptom. Should it have automatically triggered a COVID test, or did it? I'm finding it difficult to pin that do
@Lapacho34866835 @EvolvingBrain8 @adnm_live @TroncheBiais Vous êtes expert en gestion du médicament ? Médecin ? Non, expert Twitter et éponge à merde de réseau social. Les essais de phase 3 préalables à la mise sur le marché ont été réalisés sur des volon
@Bedakken @MissMel_12_ Hier. De resultaten van de in november 2020 afgeronde klinische testfases. Waaraan grofweg 10x MEER proefpersonen deelnamen dan gebruikelijk... https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk https://t.co/l6XjNELq0t
@MISM_1968 @robinmonotti Covid-19: Study provides further evidence that mRNA vaccines are safe in pregnancy: https://t.co/mhCpZg0Dvk Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine: https://t.co/WqwGlgQVy7
@GabiPizarro12 Mira, Gabi, para que veas que me caes bien te voy a ayudar en tu empeño por ridiculizarte. Aquí tienes el documento que, según tú, Pfizer ha borrado, dónde habla del 95 % de eficacia (no 90) ¿Seguro que quieres seguir? https://t.co/LGoRJNqcg
@chrissy_crown @JCmacc1 @FiveTimesAugust A long-debunked lie. https://t.co/wwEPh2b3rn Trial study was published way back in 2020, in peer-reviewed journal, readable by everyone. https://t.co/PA4PAp0h0w The ridiculousness of the lies is only exceeded by
@roadjull @Friedemann1 Have you finally learned how vaccine development + testing works yet, non-expert vaccine denialist? https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc https://t.co/pJZz8g78F3 https://t.co/9IA0rxAD2e
@cryptometal @MarionKoopmans Jij liegt. Het feit dat aanvullende onderzoeken worden gedaan naar de effecten van vaccinatie onder zwangeren, betekent niet dat zij bij eerdere studies waren uitgesloten. Of kan jij laten zien WAAR staat dat zwangere vrouwen
@cryptometal @MarionKoopmans Het was een voorwaardelijk goedkeuring. Dus een goedkeuring die pas wordt afgegeven NA AFRONDING van alle vereiste testfases. En in de fase 3 studie waren zwangere vrouwen niet uitgesloten: https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk https://t.
RT @lonnibesancon: Un antivax pris la main dans le sac avec 2 mensonges sur 2 infos. https://t.co/BcPHNMvu7y
RT @lonnibesancon: @MWidcoq @Booguis1 1/ Cette Brook Jackson qui a perdu son procès? 🤡 https://t.co/oSbTLgZmGV 2/ Pourquoi elle n'est pa…
Un antivax pris la main dans le sac avec 2 mensonges sur 2 infos. https://t.co/BcPHNMvu7y
@MWidcoq @Booguis1 1/ Cette Brook Jackson qui a perdu son procès? 🤡 https://t.co/oSbTLgZmGV 2/ Pourquoi elle n'est pas dans la liste des auteurs de la phase 3 alors? Elle bossait chez Ventavia, pas Pfizer. https://t.co/Abk8vZO8FM
@bull_wrighter @HozaCatama Pfizer COVID19 vaccine trial does not show 21 deaths due to COVID19 vaccines. No deaths were considered by the investigators to be related to the vaccine or placebo. The 6 month follow up data showed 96.7% reduction in severe d
@Medical_Nemesis the very first trial that got them approved showed a 90% protection from infection. https://t.co/xmIiRhSAxI Unfortunately COVID keeps mutating very fast, so this is no longer true
@Will17379050 @barbyblanche @LeonardaCianci https://t.co/ErCRB7FLZk parti da qui. Dopo aver preso una laurea in capo medico. E poi ne riparliamo. Ciao capra.
@chrissy_crown @FiveTimesAugust Nope, the FDA said that, starting now, it would take them 75 years to release 33,000 pages of *their* files on the Pfizer vaccine at a rate of 500 pages per month. This has been debunked a million times now. Pfizer publish
@chrissy_crown @FiveTimesAugust They literally did, in trials and real world settings. https://t.co/Ac7TamR2kY
@Scherflein1 @SHomburg @Tim_Roehn @EMA_News Mindestens 1 der Studien war "gut" genug im Ergebnis, um mich davon abzuhalten. "95% effektiv vs. ARR von lausigen 0.0071% (NNV von 141)" 141 Impfungen für einen "Erfolg", und das bei dem Risikoprofil + niedrig
@JeffreyRumney @yeahnaa333 @zap_lock What does Pfizer’s own P3 clinical trial say, tool bag? 😀 https://t.co/LPXszEVrmV https://t.co/idkqgmagCm
@barbyblanche Il foglietto illustrativo dice che immunizza e protegge dalla malattia. Lo studio clinico Pfizer in allegato dimostra efficacia e sicurezza. Barbara perché credi alle fake news? https://t.co/ErCRB7FLZk https://t.co/W4A2w9MJHi
@LottaViehler Sie verbreiten die Unwahrheit. Wissentlich oder unwissentlich. Nirgendwo wird in der Zulassungsstudie, die ich anhänge, die Effizienz gegen Transmission bestimmt. https://t.co/d5QC7fjGCH
@MajaSeelen Als de werkelijkheid je niet past, verzin je er zelf een. Hier een klinische test van het Pfizer-vaccin met 43.448 deelnemers. https://t.co/VQw5hQwY8W
@Nodo23049099 @Thekhilha1 @29quovadis Je t'ai déjà expliqué que les m***** ARNm te font produire 0 anticorps !! Tiens, le "ça protège des formes graves", avec la m**** de Pfizer : https://t.co/xDJLIHYHxu Figure 3, tu te prétends biologiste, tu dois donc s
RT @SCMountainGoat: Don’t ever let the Branch Covidians gaslight you. If it was never meant to stop transmission, then why was everyone ch…
@Mounotella @TroncheBiais Les essais Pfizer ont été publiés dans une revue spécialisée à comité de lecture. https://t.co/LHmIm6V6AM
@hpareek @theliverdr Full phase 3 trial data for Pfizer Covid19 vaccine is available online in the New England Journal of Medicine, one of the best scientific journal. https://t.co/OshVYcodTA
@FESmith1872 @zap_lock Here's a phase III RCT right before the EUA/rollout: https://t.co/08KsWwENdw
@Dania_Janna_ @silvano_trotta @Najadi4Justice Ce n’est pas ce que dit la littérature scientifique: https://t.co/KWCBbHRfSN https://t.co/9HLqFWzbw3 https://t.co/LhqxnWNzoz https://t.co/Jxgko2a26H
@horclas Randomized Controlled Trials. Anbei zur Lektüre : https://t.co/8ya68e2G8r https://t.co/FcqJQUDJvL
@robertopaulos85 @MattJam28 @ClareCraigPath Not e.g. here, the basis for the Pfizer EUA: https://t.co/tw8UZCe5LT (consult Table S3). Also, competent people know to only use statistically significant numbers…
@CaponioLena @leanne_george @Mr_Magoo5 @goc1978 @notMrFarmer @SovietSong23 It is nothing to do with TV. That's just a pathetic AV claim that shows they do no research... https://t.co/4xOMJtmMvP
@TruthHurts2160 @ParadiceBTC @wolsned That's the same ridiculous lie, again. The data is here: https://t.co/PA4PAp0OQ4
@TruthHurts2160 @ParadiceBTC @wolsned Because the clinical trials proved it was effective. Read the article, lying moron. https://t.co/PA4PAp0OQ4
@TruthHurts2160 @ParadiceBTC @wolsned Another lie. Clinical trial data was published in 2020. https://t.co/PA4PAp0OQ4
@Tax_is_Robbery I don’t care if you get vaccinated or not, I’m just here to call you out as being a risk to others. Yeah, here’s my evidence. Go ahead & provide your critical evaluation, this should be good. 🤣https://t.co/YoxKwRXUvd
@ByteOctet @EpicurienB @arikouts @Xyz_Apologia @TroncheBiais @decoder_l non mais genre là ils ont fait un follow up jusqu'à 6 mois après la seconde dose https://t.co/OoqxzEBX6s Sont où les morts ?
RT @blackcloudsix: For the dummy antivaxxers out there. You know who you are.
For the dummy antivaxxers out there. You know who you are.
@Paulmcg52457951 @Mark_Koncz @DiedSuddenly_ Read it yourself https://t.co/6bIA1YMqRc
@AusThinkingGirl @BrentHodgson @DrCameronMurray check the date https://t.co/bmzaHoPkZh
@Rimbau_delaire @lazlowoodbine42 @19joho You're a lost cause. I'm just using you for lulz + as an object lesson for others in baseless conspiracism and denialism. There's no more chance of getting through to you than of getting through to a flat earther,
@Rimbau_delaire @lazlowoodbine42 @19joho And you still have nothing but a bunch of paranoid ramblings typical of non-expert vaccine denialists. The vaccines passed phase 3 RCTs, and so are not experimental + fine to be on the market. Deal with it. 🤷♂️
@MarkMazman @RonDePinho @MethodistHosp Now you’re just lying uncreatively. https://t.co/YoxKwRXUvd
@DrCameronMurray I mean just start here and write a critique https://t.co/bmzaHoPkZh
@fantasmex @BBarucker @ethikrat @AnwaltUlbrich Hä? Sie reden wirr. Die Zulassungsstudie wurde am 10 Dezember 2020 im New England Journal of Medicine veröffentlicht. Nix Klage! Ich habe Sie selber schon im Dezember 2020 gelesen. Sie kennen sie offensichtli
@Shellsagain Read what I wrote again, carefully and look at the clinical trial. https://t.co/6bIA1YMqRc
@MdBreathe You are morally dishonest and ignorant. The prospective randomized trials proved that vaccines decrease sickness secondary to COVID by more than 90%. To perform another trial with millions of patients would have been unethical. https://t.co/j4
@fantasmex @BBarucker @ethikrat Was haben Sie bei der Zulassungsstudie von z.B. Comirnaty nicht verstanden? https://t.co/d5QC7fjGCH
RT @tasinasie: @reitschuster Antwort der EMA am besten selber lesen & über d. gespielte Empörung lachen. Dass der Schutz v. Übertragung ni…
@GiggaMAGA @AnotherRunHQ @TravelGraeme Hold on. You're the one making the claim. So prove it. In the meantime here is a study proving the safety and efficacy of Covid19 vaccines. This is only one of many. https://t.co/osLsvyWOvz(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20dose
@esquerdananet 1. Se você não sabe a diferença entre RNA (terapia gênica) e RNA-mensageiro (vacina) você é EXTREMAMENTE BURRO. 2. Vou te provar a vacina é eficaz: se você sabe o mínimo de ciência toma aqui https://t.co/JNTyDZGLfa
@rosenbusch_ Tue doch nicht so, als würde es Dir um die Sache gehen…. https://t.co/lQBxFsDpEQ https://t.co/rXXIfjEW9R https://t.co/1zULuux1qL
@teachertwit2 @FiveTimesAugust @DollyParton @moderna_tx Here ya go hun