↓ Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence Is Stupid and Causal Reasoning Will Not Fix It

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
187 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Artificial Intelligence Is Stupid and Causal Reasoning Will Not Fix It
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.513474
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Mark Bishop

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 187 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 189 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 21%
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Master 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 54 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 46 24%
Engineering 13 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Other 45 24%
Unknown 62 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#295,321
of 26,738,782 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#636
of 35,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,360
of 535,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#23
of 920 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,738,782 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 920 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.