↓ Skip to main content

Quadriceps and Patellar Tendon Thickness and Stiffness in Elite Track Cyclists: An Ultrasonographic and Myotonometric Evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quadriceps and Patellar Tendon Thickness and Stiffness in Elite Track Cyclists: An Ultrasonographic and Myotonometric Evaluation
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.607208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Klich, Krzysztof Ficek, Igor Krymski, Andrzej Klimek, Adam Kawczyński, Pascal Madeleine, Cesar Fernández-de-las-Peñas

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 38 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 22 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 45 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#18,119,559
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#7,350
of 13,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,749
of 506,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#253
of 439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.