↓ Skip to main content

Rescheduling Manufacturing Systems: A Framework of Strategies, Policies, and Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Scheduling, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 141)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
632 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Rescheduling Manufacturing Systems: A Framework of Strategies, Policies, and Methods
Published in
Journal of Scheduling, January 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1022235519958
Authors

Guilherme E. Vieira, Jeffrey W. Herrmann, Edward Lin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 355 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 19%
Student > Bachelor 35 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 9%
Researcher 32 9%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 67 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 151 40%
Business, Management and Accounting 56 15%
Computer Science 39 10%
Decision Sciences 11 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 2%
Other 22 6%
Unknown 86 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,914,119
of 25,947,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scheduling
#2
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,843
of 139,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scheduling
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,947,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them