You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical Dimensions of Using Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2019.121 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 294 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 41 | 14% |
| Spain | 19 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 6% |
| India | 11 | 4% |
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 44 | 15% |
| Unknown | 137 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 259 | 88% |
| Scientists | 20 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 465 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 11% |
| Researcher | 36 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 84 | 18% |
| Unknown | 187 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 36 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 5% |
| Engineering | 24 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 101 | 22% |
| Unknown | 207 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 243. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#161,016
of 26,186,522 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#47
of 2,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,336
of 451,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,186,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.