The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Should Clinicians Communicate With Patients About the Roles of Artificially Intelligent Team Members?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2019.138 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Schiff, Jason Borenstein |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 73% |
| Scientists | 8 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 55 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 65 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#939,837
of 26,380,671 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#245
of 2,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,529
of 452,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#8
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,380,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.