You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What Historical Ideals of Women's Shapes Teach Us About Women's Self-Perception and Body Decisions Today.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2019.879 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nealie Tan Ngo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 43% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 4 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,002,678
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#269
of 2,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,103
of 365,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.