The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Should Decision Making Be Shared in High-Risk Pediatric Heart Donation?
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2020.401 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Efrat Lelkes, Angira Patel, Anna Joong, Jeffrey G Gossett |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 2 | 25% |
Canada | 2 | 25% |
United States | 2 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Psychology | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,312,243
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1,553
of 2,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,274
of 413,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#27
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.