The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Should Public Health Officials Respond When Important Local Rituals Increase Risk of Contagion?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2020.5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esther Mokuwa, Paul Richards |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 59% |
| Scientists | 10 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 411. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2022.
All research outputs
#76,756
of 26,557,556 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#20
of 2,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,672
of 484,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.