↓ Skip to main content

How Should Harm Reduction Be Included in Care Continua for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Should Harm Reduction Be Included in Care Continua for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, July 2024
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2024.562
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Salisbury-Afshar, Catherine J Livingston, Ricky N Bluthenthal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2024.
All research outputs
#20,845,550
of 26,482,830 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#2,503
of 2,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,858
of 286,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,482,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.