The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Promoting Cost Transparency to Reduce Financial Harm to Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.11.mhst1-1511 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reshma Gupta, Cynthia Tsay, Robert L Fogerty |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 40% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 20% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,506,938
of 26,240,084 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#752
of 2,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,688
of 295,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#19
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,240,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.