You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How Should Clinicians Treat Patients Who Might Be Undocumented?
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.ecas4-1603 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeff Sconyers, Tyler Tate |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 34% |
Philippines | 1 | 2% |
Kenya | 1 | 2% |
Central African Republic | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
Mauritius | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 64% |
Scientists | 9 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#977,206
of 26,205,030 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#260
of 2,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,109
of 313,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#7
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,205,030 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.