The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Curriculum of Caring: Fostering Compassionate, Person-Centered Health Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.medu1-1604 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerry Boyd |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 23% |
| Canada | 5 | 16% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 26% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 15% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2016.
All research outputs
#1,891,511
of 26,254,370 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#565
of 2,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,984
of 316,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#13
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,254,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.