You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Should Physicians Respond When Patients Distrust Them Because of Their Gender?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.4.ecas2-1704 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica Peek, Bernard Lo, Alicia Fernandez |
| Abstract |
There are many reasons why gender-concordant care benefits patients and is requested by them. For training hospitals, however, such requests present challenges as well as opportunities in providing patient-centered care. Responding to a case in which a female patient who is having a routine exam refuses care from a male medical student, we discuss ethical principles involved in gender-concordant care requests, when it is appropriate to question such requests, and a team-based approach to responding to them. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 31% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 17% |
| Scientists | 8 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,143,639
of 26,061,338 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#323
of 2,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,330
of 327,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#16
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,061,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.