You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Repairing “Difficult” Patient-Clinician Relationships
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.4.medu3-1704 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Denise M Dudzinski, Carrol Alvarez |
| Abstract |
Using a case example, we offer guidance for improving "difficult" clinician-patient relationships. These relationships may be repaired by acknowledging a clinician's part in conflict, empathizing with patients, identifying a patient's skill deficits, and employing communication and engagement techniques used by mental health professionals. Clinicians will inevitably take on more of the work of repairing damaged relationships, but doing so improves the odds of these patients receiving the help they need. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 16% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 29 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 55% |
| Scientists | 14 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 34% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 31% |
| Psychology | 6 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,051,288
of 26,177,473 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#294
of 2,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,622
of 327,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#15
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,177,473 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.