The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Should Race Be Used as a Variable in Research on Preterm Birth?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.sect1-1803 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kacey Y Eichelberger, Julianna G Alson, Kemi M Doll |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 43% |
| Iceland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 54% |
| Scientists | 9 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,809,797
of 26,586,231 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#547
of 2,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,003
of 349,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#18
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,586,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.