The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Judging Doctors—The Person and the Professional
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.10.msoc1-1110 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nadia N Sawicki |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 20% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,203,738
of 26,451,700 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#339
of 2,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,004
of 147,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,451,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.