The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
AMA Code of Medical Ethics' opinions on allocating medical resources.
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.4.coet1-1104 |
Pubmed ID |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 47% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,723,422
of 26,558,784 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#812
of 2,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,609
of 123,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.