The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Risk Perception, Bias, and the Role of the Patient-Doctor Relationship in Decision Making about Cerebral Aneurysm Surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1001/virtualmentor.2015.17.1.ecas1-1501 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 32% |
Canada | 2 | 9% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 5% |
Antarctica | 1 | 5% |
Israel | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 32% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 20% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 40% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 10% |
Engineering | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,507,847
of 26,407,726 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#745
of 2,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,334
of 362,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#12
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,407,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.