The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Healthy Humans Reduces Sympathetic Nerve Activity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brain Stimulation, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.brs.2014.07.031 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer A. Clancy, David A. Mary, Klaus K. Witte, John P. Greenwood, Susan A. Deuchars, Jim Deuchars |
Abstract |
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is currently used to treat refractory epilepsy and is being investigated as a potential therapy for a range of conditions, including heart failure, tinnitus, obesity and Alzheimer's disease. However, the invasive nature and expense limits the use of VNS in patient populations and hinders the exploration of the mechanisms involved. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Italy | 1 | 7% |
Japan | 1 | 7% |
Germany | 1 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 608 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | <1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 594 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 87 | 14% |
Student > Master | 86 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 69 | 11% |
Other | 35 | 6% |
Other | 107 | 18% |
Unknown | 152 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 22% |
Neuroscience | 76 | 13% |
Psychology | 62 | 10% |
Engineering | 42 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 5% |
Other | 80 | 13% |
Unknown | 181 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#405,243
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Brain Stimulation
#34
of 2,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,483
of 245,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Stimulation
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.