Detection and quantification of new psychoactive substances (NPSs) within the evolved “ legal high ” product, NRG-2, using high performance liquid chromatography-amperometric detection (HPLC-AD)
Khaled Y. Zuway, Jamie P. Smith, Christopher W. Foster, Nikil Kapur, Craig E. Banks, Oliver B. Sutcliffe
Abstract
The global increase in the production and abuse of cathinone-derived New Psychoactive Substances (NPSs) has developed the requirement for rapid, selective and sensitive protocols for their separation and detection. Electrochemical sensing of these compounds has been demonstrated to be an effective method for the in-field detection of these substances, either in their pure form or in the presence of common adulterants, however, the technique is limited in its ability to discriminate between structurally related cathinone-derivatives (for example: (±)-4'-methylmethcathinone (4-MMC, ) and (±)-4'-methyl-N-ethylmethcathinone (4-MEC, ) when they are both present in a mixture. In this paper we demonstrate, for the first time, the combination of HPLC-UV with amperometric detection (HPLC-AD) for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of 4-MMC and 4-MEC using either a commercially available impinging jet (LC-FC-A) or custom-made iCell channel (LC-FC-B) flow-cell system incorporating embedded graphite screen-printed macroelectrodes. The protocol offers a cost-effective, reproducible and reliable sensor platform for the simultaneous HPLC-UV and amperometric detection of the target analytes. The two systems have similar limits of detection, in terms of amperometric detection [LC-FC-A: 14.66 μg mL(-1) () and 9.35 μg mL(-1) (); LC-FC-B: 57.92 μg mL(-1) () and 26.91 μg mL(-1) ()], to the previously reported oxidative electrochemical protocol [39.8 μg mL(-1) () and 84.2 μg mL(-1) ()], for two synthetic cathinones, prevalent on the recreational drugs market. Though not as sensitive as standard HPLC-UV detection, both flow cells show a good agreement, between the quantitative electroanalytical data, thereby making them suitable for the detection and quantification of 4-MMC and 4-MEC, either in their pure form or within complex mixtures. Additionally, the simultaneous HPLC-UV and amperometric detection protocol detailed herein shows a marked improvement and advantage over previously reported electroanalytical methods, which were either unable to selectively discriminate between structurally related synthetic cathinones (e.g. 4-MMC and 4-MEC) or utilised harmful and restrictive materials in their design.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
4
11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
3
8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
1
3%
Immunology and Microbiology
1
3%
Other
3
8%
Unknown
12
32%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,420,033
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Analyst
#4,398
of 5,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,850
of 353,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analyst
#248
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,795 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
