The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perceived Causes of Students’ Poor Performance in Mathematics: A Case Study at Ba and Tavua Secondary Schools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fams.2021.614408 |
| Authors |
Samlesh Chand, Kaylash Chaudhary, Avinesh Prasad, Vishal Chand |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 207 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 136 | 66% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 24 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 135 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,561,759
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
#58
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,422
of 453,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.