The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sparseness-constrained nonnegative tensor factorization for detecting topics at different time scales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fams.2024.1287074 |
| Authors |
Lara Kassab, Alona Kryshchenko, Hanbaek Lyu, Denali Molitor, Deanna Needell, Elizaveta Rebrova, Jiahong Yuan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2024.
All research outputs
#20,766,366
of 26,381,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
#206
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,148
of 151,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them