The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards a Positive Welfare Protocol for Cattle: A Critical Review of Indicators and Suggestion of How We Might Proceed
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Animal Science, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fanim.2021.753080 |
| Authors |
Linda J. Keeling, Christoph Winckler, Sara Hintze, Björn Forkman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Sweden | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Austria | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 27% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 14 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,030,261
of 24,932,434 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Animal Science
#42
of 387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,061
of 423,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Animal Science
#8
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,434 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.